Smart glasses-assisted telementoring in inguinal hernia repair: a new frontier in surgical training?

Abstract Background Recent challenges in surgical training, including the COVID-19 pandemic, staff shortages, and service centralization, have accelerated the adoption of telemedicine technologies. Among these, smart glasses-assisted telementoring enables real-time, bidirectional interaction between mentor and mentee, potentially improving surgical performance and learning outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and educational impact of smart glasses-assisted telementoring in open inguinal hernia repair. Methods This prospective, randomized pilot study was conducted at the Department of General Oncological Surgery, Santa Rosa Hospital, Viterbo (Italy) from January 2024 to June 2024. Forty-five elective open inguinal hernia repairs were performed by three general surgery residents at a comparable level of their learning curve. Procedures were randomly assigned to one of three groups composed of passive assistance only, on-site mentoring and telementoring (Vuzix M400) group. Surgical and postoperative data were collected and stored for analysis. Results Procedural accuracy was significantly higher in the mentoring settings, particularly for local anesthesia administration (Group 1: 26.7%, Group 2: 80%, and Group 3: 93.3%; p = 0.001) and spermatic cord isolation (Group 1: 60%, Group 2: 86.7%, and Group 3: 100%; p = 0.014). Mean operative times were 45.33 ± 12.88, 44.00 ± 11.21, and 60.66 ± 14.37 min in groups 1–2–3, respectively ( p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were detected in postoperative pain (VAS at 3 h, 24 h, and 7 days), hematoma formation, or readmissions; however, the study was not powered to assess differences in postoperative complications. Among the fifteen telementored procedures, mentees reported that telementoring influenced surgical decision-making in 93.3% of cases and consistently improved both perceived safety and self-confidence (100%), without any reported increase in anxiety or discomfort. Conclusions Smart glasses-assisted telementoring demonstrated encouraging educational potential as a feasible approach for surgical training. These preliminary findings require confirmation in larger adequately powered studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13255-w
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart glasses-assisted telementoring in inguinal hernia repair: a new frontier in surgical training?

Chiara D’Alterio, Marta Goglia, Roberto Santoro, Cristina Carruezzo et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Smart glasses-assisted telementoring in inguinal hernia repair: a new frontier in surgical training?

Chiara D’Alterio, Marta Goglia, Roberto Santoro, Cristina Carruezzo, Angelo Goglia, Manuela Brighi, Domenico Giannotti, Antonio Bovino
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent challenges in surgical training, including the COVID-19 pandemic, staff shortages, and service centralization, have accelerated the adoption of telemedicine technologies. Among these, smart glasses-assisted telementoring enables real-time, bidirectional interaction between mentor and mentee, potentially improving surgical performance and learning outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and educational impact of smart glasses-assisted telementoring in open inguinal hernia repair. Methods This prospective, randomized pilot study was conducted at the Department of General Oncological Surgery, Santa Rosa Hospital, Viterbo (Italy) from January 2024 to June 2024. Forty-five elective open inguinal hernia repairs were performed by three general surgery residents at a comparable level of their learning curve. Procedures were randomly assigned to one of three groups composed of passive assistance only, on-site mentoring and telementoring (Vuzix M400) group. Surgical and postoperative data were collected and stored for analysis. Results Procedural accuracy was significantly higher in the mentoring settings, particularly for local anesthesia administration (Group 1: 26.7%, Group 2: 80%, and Group 3: 93.3%; p = 0.001) and spermatic cord isolation (Group 1: 60%, Group 2: 86.7%, and Group 3: 100%; p = 0.014). Mean operative times were 45.33 ± 12.88, 44.00 ± 11.21, and 60.66 ± 14.37 min in groups 1–2–3, respectively ( p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were detected in postoperative pain (VAS at 3 h, 24 h, and 7 days), hematoma formation, or readmissions; however, the study was not powered to assess differences in postoperative complications. Among the fifteen telementored procedures, mentees reported that telementoring influenced surgical decision-making in 93.3% of cases and consistently improved both perceived safety and self-confidence (100%), without any reported increase in anxiety or discomfort. Conclusions Smart glasses-assisted telementoring demonstrated encouraging educational potential as a feasible approach for surgical training. These preliminary findings require confirmation in larger adequately powered studies.

Surgical Endoscopy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.