Validation of Wound Assessment Instruments Across Brazilian Clinical Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Abstract Background Wounds are common and clinically consequential, and consistent assessment is essential for communication, monitoring, and decision-making. Although multiple wound assessment instruments exist, there is no agreement among specialists on which criteria to prioritize during validation processes and evidence synthesis remains insufficient within the Brazilian context. Objective This scoping review aims to map which aspects of wound assessment instruments are considered important by expert health professionals when validating these instruments in the Brazilian context across clinical care settings. Methods The review will be conducted in accordance with JBI guidance for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy will be used on the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as in the LILACS, SciELO, and BDENF (Base de Dados em Enfermagem) databases, supplemented by gray literature sources (Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, CAPES Theses Catalog, and Google Scholar) and reference list screening. Records will be deduplicated and screened by 2 independent reviewers, with reporting aligned to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Data will be extracted using a piloted extraction tool and synthesized descriptively in tables and with narrative mapping. Critical appraisal will not be performed. Results This protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework on February 6, 2026. Database searches are scheduled to commence following protocol publication. Data collection is projected to begin in July 2026, with screening and data extraction expected to be completed by December 2026, and the final review report planned to be submitted for publication in the first quarter of 2027. Results will map the extent, nature, and distribution of evidence on expert-led validation of Brazilian wound assessment instruments across clinical settings. Conclusions This scoping review will provide a systematic and transparent synthesis of which aspects health professionals consider when validating Brazilian national wound assessment instruments. We expect the findings to identify methodological gaps, inform future validation studies, and support the development and refinement of nationally applicable instruments across diverse Brazilian health care contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/99483
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Wound Assessment Instruments Across Brazilian Clinical Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Cléa Dometilde Soares Rodrigues, Maysa Alahmar Bianchin, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi, Matheus Querino da Silva et al.
JMIR Research Protocols
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Validation of Wound Assessment Instruments Across Brazilian Clinical Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Cléa Dometilde Soares Rodrigues, Maysa Alahmar Bianchin, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi, Matheus Querino da Silva, Emerson Roberto dos Santos, Marli de Carvalho Jericó, Luís César Fava Spessoto, Paula Buck de Oliveira Ruiz, Antônio Hélio Oliani, Rauer Ferreira Franco, Valéria Albuquerque Vaz Rodrigues, Nádia Antônia Aparecida Poletti, Denise Cristina Mós Vaz-Oliani, Leonila Santos de Almeida Sasso, João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Ana Maria Rita Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho Engel, Júlio César André, Janaína Aparecida de Sales Floriano, Clarissa Albuquerque Vaz Nunes, Izaura dos Santos Ramos, Alana Clara Santos Rocha, Camila Bortoluci de Lima, Estella Alvarez Vieira Finoto, Giovana Viecili Rossi, Pedro Carlos Cagnazzo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Wounds are common and clinically consequential, and consistent assessment is essential for communication, monitoring, and decision-making. Although multiple wound assessment instruments exist, there is no agreement among specialists on which criteria to prioritize during validation processes and evidence synthesis remains insufficient within the Brazilian context. Objective This scoping review aims to map which aspects of wound assessment instruments are considered important by expert health professionals when validating these instruments in the Brazilian context across clinical care settings. Methods The review will be conducted in accordance with JBI guidance for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy will be used on the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as in the LILACS, SciELO, and BDENF (Base de Dados em Enfermagem) databases, supplemented by gray literature sources (Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, CAPES Theses Catalog, and Google Scholar) and reference list screening. Records will be deduplicated and screened by 2 independent reviewers, with reporting aligned to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Data will be extracted using a piloted extraction tool and synthesized descriptively in tables and with narrative mapping. Critical appraisal will not be performed. Results This protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework on February 6, 2026. Database searches are scheduled to commence following protocol publication. Data collection is projected to begin in July 2026, with screening and data extraction expected to be completed by December 2026, and the final review report planned to be submitted for publication in the first quarter of 2027. Results will map the extent, nature, and distribution of evidence on expert-led validation of Brazilian wound assessment instruments across clinical settings. Conclusions This scoping review will provide a systematic and transparent synthesis of which aspects health professionals consider when validating Brazilian national wound assessment instruments. We expect the findings to identify methodological gaps, inform future validation studies, and support the development and refinement of nationally applicable instruments across diverse Brazilian health care contexts.

JMIR Research ProtocolsVol. 15
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.