Governmental fact-checking or ‘ fact-washing ’? Assessing the (un)biasedness and (im)partiality of the Centre for Countering Disinformation in Turkey

This study investigates the fact-checking practices of Turkey’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD), a particularly revealing case of governmental fact-checking in a competitive authoritarian setting, asking whether and how it engages in ‘fact-washing’, the propagandistic misuse of fact-checking to legitimise governmental narratives. Through a mixed-method analysis of 1,165 fact-checks across 146 disinformation bulletins, the findings reveal a systematic pattern: the CCD disproportionately targets opposition and foreign actors, leaves government-aligned narratives unchecked, and relies heavily on state sources to legitimise its assessments. It also deploys differentiated delegitimisation strategies depending on claim origin. Introducing the concept of fact-washing, this article contributes to debates on disinformation governance and the politicisation of fact-checking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South European Society & Politics
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2026.2708661
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governmental fact-checking or ‘ fact-washing ’? Assessing the (un)biasedness and (im)partiality of the Centre for Countering Disinformation in Turkey

L. Bos, Onurcan Güden
South European Society & Politics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Governmental fact-checking or ‘ fact-washing ’? Assessing the (un)biasedness and (im)partiality of the Centre for Countering Disinformation in Turkey

L. Bos, Onurcan Güden
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the fact-checking practices of Turkey’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD), a particularly revealing case of governmental fact-checking in a competitive authoritarian setting, asking whether and how it engages in ‘fact-washing’, the propagandistic misuse of fact-checking to legitimise governmental narratives. Through a mixed-method analysis of 1,165 fact-checks across 146 disinformation bulletins, the findings reveal a systematic pattern: the CCD disproportionately targets opposition and foreign actors, leaves government-aligned narratives unchecked, and relies heavily on state sources to legitimise its assessments. It also deploys differentiated delegitimisation strategies depending on claim origin. Introducing the concept of fact-washing, this article contributes to debates on disinformation governance and the politicisation of fact-checking.

South European Society & Politics
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.