A Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Framework for Hydrological Environmental-Flow Method Selection in the Upper Datong River

Hydrological methods are widely used for environmental-flow assessment in data-limited rivers, but different methods often produce divergent monthly thresholds, making method selection difficult under strong seasonal variability. This study develops a scenario-based multi-objective framework for selecting hydrological environmental-flow methods in the upper Datong River, a cold-region and semi-arid headwater tributary of the upper Yellow River. Using daily discharge records from the Gadatan hydrological station during 1956–2022, monthly environmental-flow thresholds were estimated using nine commonly applied hydrological methods. A four-dimensional RDVS framework was constructed to evaluate reliability, deficit intensity, naturalness deviation, and intra-annual rhythm distance. Pareto non-dominated screening and scenario-oriented ranking were then applied under three management scenarios: low-flow baseline protection, critical-period protection, and annual process consistency. The results show that low-flow months exhibit higher empirical variability and greater kurtosis and are associated with greater inter-method divergence. The Tennant method ranked first under the low-flow baseline scenario, whereas the intra-annual distribution method ranked first under both the critical-period and annual-consistency scenarios. The Texas method consistently entered the top three across all scenarios, indicating cross-scenario robustness. The targeted anomaly test and the annual-block bootstrap both supported the stability of the primary recommendations: the Tennant method ranked first in 94.0% of the S1 bootstrap replicates, whereas the intra-annual distribution method ranked first in 98.7% and 100.0% of the S2 and S3 replicates, respectively. Overall, the proposed framework transforms hydrological method comparison into a transparent, scenario-based, and reproducible selection process and provides a hydrology-based decision-support tool for screening candidate environmental-flow methods in data-limited rivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18178664
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Framework for Hydrological Environmental-Flow Method Selection in the Upper Datong River

Wanqi Wang, Feng Wang, Xiaoyan Wei, Hao Wang et al.
Sustainability
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

A Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Framework for Hydrological Environmental-Flow Method Selection in the Upper Datong River

Wanqi Wang, Feng Wang, Xiaoyan Wei, Hao Wang, Kang Li
article en

Abstract

Hydrological methods are widely used for environmental-flow assessment in data-limited rivers, but different methods often produce divergent monthly thresholds, making method selection difficult under strong seasonal variability. This study develops a scenario-based multi-objective framework for selecting hydrological environmental-flow methods in the upper Datong River, a cold-region and semi-arid headwater tributary of the upper Yellow River. Using daily discharge records from the Gadatan hydrological station during 1956–2022, monthly environmental-flow thresholds were estimated using nine commonly applied hydrological methods. A four-dimensional RDVS framework was constructed to evaluate reliability, deficit intensity, naturalness deviation, and intra-annual rhythm distance. Pareto non-dominated screening and scenario-oriented ranking were then applied under three management scenarios: low-flow baseline protection, critical-period protection, and annual process consistency. The results show that low-flow months exhibit higher empirical variability and greater kurtosis and are associated with greater inter-method divergence. The Tennant method ranked first under the low-flow baseline scenario, whereas the intra-annual distribution method ranked first under both the critical-period and annual-consistency scenarios. The Texas method consistently entered the top three across all scenarios, indicating cross-scenario robustness. The targeted anomaly test and the annual-block bootstrap both supported the stability of the primary recommendations: the Tennant method ranked first in 94.0% of the S1 bootstrap replicates, whereas the intra-annual distribution method ranked first in 98.7% and 100.0% of the S2 and S3 replicates, respectively. Overall, the proposed framework transforms hydrological method comparison into a transparent, scenario-based, and reproducible selection process and provides a hydrology-based decision-support tool for screening candidate environmental-flow methods in data-limited rivers.

SustainabilityVol. 18(17)
Qinghai University (CN), Tianjin University (CN), Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Qinghai New Energy (China) (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.