Wrongful Data Linking and the Right to Compensation under GDPR

This legal case study examines the wrongful linking of personal data to a debt-collection case and the resulting questions of data accuracy, lawfulness, accountability and compensation under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It analyses the distinction between the underlying debt dispute and the independent legality of personal-data processing, with particular attention to Articles 5, 6, 24 and 82 GDPR. The study considers relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, including C-300/21 Österreichische Post, C-340/21 Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and C-590/22 PS, and examines when loss of control over personal data, uncertainty concerning their use and justified fears of misuse may constitute non-material damage. The paper also discusses the 2026 CSDD data-security incident as part of the broader Latvian data-protection risk context, while expressly distinguishing that incident from the individual debt-collection case. It concludes with a structured assessment of a EUR 2,500 compensation claim and a practical evidence matrix for establishing infringement, damage and causation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22086639
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wrongful Data Linking and the Right to Compensation under GDPR

Diks Ancveirs
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Wrongful Data Linking and the Right to Compensation under GDPR

Diks Ancveirs
article en

Abstract

This legal case study examines the wrongful linking of personal data to a debt-collection case and the resulting questions of data accuracy, lawfulness, accountability and compensation under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It analyses the distinction between the underlying debt dispute and the independent legality of personal-data processing, with particular attention to Articles 5, 6, 24 and 82 GDPR. The study considers relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, including C-300/21 Österreichische Post, C-340/21 Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and C-590/22 PS, and examines when loss of control over personal data, uncertainty concerning their use and justified fears of misuse may constitute non-material damage. The paper also discusses the 2026 CSDD data-security incident as part of the broader Latvian data-protection risk context, while expressly distinguishing that incident from the individual debt-collection case. It concludes with a structured assessment of a EUR 2,500 compensation claim and a practical evidence matrix for establishing infringement, damage and causation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wrongful Data Linking and the Right to Compensation under GDPR — Diks Ancveirs · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS