PFAS: challenges and scientific perspectives in human health risk assessment

To review recent advances in research on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and outline priority steps for risk assessment in consumer health protection, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) organized the 'International PFAS Conference' in Berlin in October 2025. Building on the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) opinion in 2020, global research activities on PFAS have intensified. The conference was attended by 200 participants from 18 countries and covered topics such as analytical methods, human exposure, toxicokinetics, toxicity, and future perspectives. Given that there are more than 21,000 different PFAS in use, discussions highlighted the need for further data collection and a basis for prioritizing substances. Robust exposure assessment requires improved analytical methods combined with newly developed predictive tools to quantify, identify, and make better use of non-target data. Hazard characterization may benefit from the combined use of classic experimental data sets, epidemiological data, and new approach methodologies (NAMs) data. The participants emphasized the continuous need for refined data and proposed a systematic consolidation of global data on shared data platforms, accompanied by corresponding guidelines for data usage. In the final panel discussion, effective risk communication was identified as a critical challenge, necessitating clear and consistent messaging for the public and policymakers. The conference concluded with five key recommendations for future health risk assessments: prioritizing PFAS; improving analytical methods; promoting generation of robust data and data gap filling; promoting open science, including the development of shared data infrastructure and cross-institutional knowledge exchange; and strengthening risk communication. These recommendations aim to support transparent, evidence-based and effective PFAS consumer health risk management in the decades ahead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04523-8
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PFAS: challenges and scientific perspectives in human health risk assessment

Runa S. Boeddinghaus, Alexander Eckhardt, S.P.J. van Leeuwen, G. Schoeters et al.
Archives of Toxicology
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

PFAS: challenges and scientific perspectives in human health risk assessment

Runa S. Boeddinghaus, Alexander Eckhardt, S.P.J. van Leeuwen, G. Schoeters, Periklis Tsiros, Thorsten Buhrke, Kristina Jakobsson, Christian Jung, Louise Ramhøj, J. Kowalczyk, Federica Madia, Katharina Sommerkorn, Bernd Göckener, JAMES C.Y. CHAN, Ron L. A. P. Hoogenboom, Jorge Numata, Bernhard Monien, Thorhallur I. Halldorsson, Finnian Freeling, Klaus Abraham, Christina August, Tony Fletcher, Xenia Trier, Christian Unkelbach, Dorte Herzke
article en

Abstract

To review recent advances in research on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and outline priority steps for risk assessment in consumer health protection, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) organized the 'International PFAS Conference' in Berlin in October 2025. Building on the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) opinion in 2020, global research activities on PFAS have intensified. The conference was attended by 200 participants from 18 countries and covered topics such as analytical methods, human exposure, toxicokinetics, toxicity, and future perspectives. Given that there are more than 21,000 different PFAS in use, discussions highlighted the need for further data collection and a basis for prioritizing substances. Robust exposure assessment requires improved analytical methods combined with newly developed predictive tools to quantify, identify, and make better use of non-target data. Hazard characterization may benefit from the combined use of classic experimental data sets, epidemiological data, and new approach methodologies (NAMs) data. The participants emphasized the continuous need for refined data and proposed a systematic consolidation of global data on shared data platforms, accompanied by corresponding guidelines for data usage. In the final panel discussion, effective risk communication was identified as a critical challenge, necessitating clear and consistent messaging for the public and policymakers. The conference concluded with five key recommendations for future health risk assessments: prioritizing PFAS; improving analytical methods; promoting generation of robust data and data gap filling; promoting open science, including the development of shared data infrastructure and cross-institutional knowledge exchange; and strengthening risk communication. These recommendations aim to support transparent, evidence-based and effective PFAS consumer health risk management in the decades ahead.

Archives of Toxicology
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), University of Copenhagen (DK), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Antwerp (BE), University of Iceland (IS), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), German Environment Agency (DE), DVGW - Technologiezentrum Wasser (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE), Landwirtschaftliches Technologiezentrum Augustenberg (DE), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR), NILU (NO), University of Gothenburg (SE), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.