Effect of multi-system polishing on shear bond strength of nanohybrid composites to enamel: an in vitro study

Background The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of three enamel finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex discs, lithium disilicate Eve burs and lithium disilicate polishing burs) on the shear bond strength and distribution of failure modes of nanohybrid composite resin bonded to enamel. Materials and Methods A sample of 240 healthy human premolars were randomized into four treatment groups ( n = 60 per group): (1) untreated control, (2) Sof-Lex disc polishing, (3) lithium disilicate EVE burs (Li-EVE) burs, and (4) lithium disilicate polishing burs (Li-Polish) burs. Specimens were prepared with standardized protocols and restored with a nanohybrid composite and universal adhesive system. The enamel surfaces were etched with 35% phosphoric acid. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured using a universal testing machine and fracture modes were assessed with a dissecting microscope. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Games–Howell post hoc test, and chi-square analysis of the mode of failure were conducted at α = 0.05. Results There were significant differences in SBS between the groups (F(3,236) = 10.54, p = 1.6 ± 10 −6 ). Both Sof-Lex (31.39 ± 7.81 MPa) and Li-Polish (30.94 ± 5.70 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength values than control (23.18 ± 14.04 MPa) and Li-EVE (26.00 ± 8.26 MPa) ( p ≤ 0.024). There was no significant difference between Sof-Lex and Li-Polish (p = 0.82). The failure modes were predominantly cohesive in all the groups and the distribution of failure modes was not significantly different ( χ 2 (3) = 6.31, p = 0.098, Cramér’s V = 0.162). Conclusion The enamel polishing system significantly influenced composite bond strength. Multi-step polishing systems, e.g. , Sof-Lex discs or Li-Polish burs, increased adhesive performance markedly over the control groups or one-step polished systems to untreated enamel. The failure mode was not significantly influenced by polishing systems. These findings demonstrated the importance of finishing systems for successful restorative performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21549
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of multi-system polishing on shear bond strength of nanohybrid composites to enamel: an in vitro study

Anuj Bhardwaj, Swadheena Patro, Khalid M. Abdelaziz, Abdulrahman Yahya Alshahrani et al.
PeerJ
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of multi-system polishing on shear bond strength of nanohybrid composites to enamel: an in vitro study

Anuj Bhardwaj, Swadheena Patro, Khalid M. Abdelaziz, Abdulrahman Yahya Alshahrani, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Ali Alsaeed, Basil M. Rubayan, Musleh AlShahrani, Ayman M. Fae, Mohammed A. Alshahrani, Suraj Arora
article en

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of three enamel finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex discs, lithium disilicate Eve burs and lithium disilicate polishing burs) on the shear bond strength and distribution of failure modes of nanohybrid composite resin bonded to enamel. Materials and Methods A sample of 240 healthy human premolars were randomized into four treatment groups ( n = 60 per group): (1) untreated control, (2) Sof-Lex disc polishing, (3) lithium disilicate EVE burs (Li-EVE) burs, and (4) lithium disilicate polishing burs (Li-Polish) burs. Specimens were prepared with standardized protocols and restored with a nanohybrid composite and universal adhesive system. The enamel surfaces were etched with 35% phosphoric acid. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured using a universal testing machine and fracture modes were assessed with a dissecting microscope. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Games–Howell post hoc test, and chi-square analysis of the mode of failure were conducted at α = 0.05. Results There were significant differences in SBS between the groups (F(3,236) = 10.54, p = 1.6 ± 10 −6 ). Both Sof-Lex (31.39 ± 7.81 MPa) and Li-Polish (30.94 ± 5.70 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength values than control (23.18 ± 14.04 MPa) and Li-EVE (26.00 ± 8.26 MPa) ( p ≤ 0.024). There was no significant difference between Sof-Lex and Li-Polish (p = 0.82). The failure modes were predominantly cohesive in all the groups and the distribution of failure modes was not significantly different ( χ 2 (3) = 6.31, p = 0.098, Cramér’s V = 0.162). Conclusion The enamel polishing system significantly influenced composite bond strength. Multi-step polishing systems, e.g. , Sof-Lex discs or Li-Polish burs, increased adhesive performance markedly over the control groups or one-step polished systems to untreated enamel. The failure mode was not significantly influenced by polishing systems. These findings demonstrated the importance of finishing systems for successful restorative performance.

PeerJVol. 14
Primary Health Care (QA), Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital (IN), KIIT University (IN), King Khalid University (SA), Ragas Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.