Within-session test specific calibration in the T-agility test

This study aims to determine the minimum familiarization threshold (test-specific calibration) required to measure true performance capacity in the T-agility test and to mathematically demonstrate the systematic bias during this process. The high performance variability observed in the initial trials of agility tests stems from a cognitive and neuromotor calibration process where the athlete attempts to adapt to the test boundaries and rules, rather than from physical inadequacy. Thirty-four youth athletes with team-sport backgrounds (age: 16.12 ± 0.81 years) who were entirely naive to the standardized T-test protocol were included in the study. To optimally minimize the effects of fatigue, the athletes performed 9 consecutive successful T-test trials with 4-minute full recovery periods between each repetition. The obtained data were analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The results indicated that the athletes' performance times improved significantly from the first trial (T1) to the sixth trial (T6). However, no statistically significant difference was detected among the T6, T7, T8, and T9 measurements, indicating that performance stabilized during this 4-trial plateau phase. A substantial systematic bias of 2.89 seconds was found between the participants' initial trial (T1) and their achieved peak score (Tpeak). Consequently, to allow athletes to reflect their true agility levels with optimally minimized fatigue and the novice reaction, we strongly recommend completing a calibration process of at least 5 repetitions at the beginning of the test. Based on these findings, the '5+3 Protocol'—which involves regarding the first 5 trials as familiarization to be excluded, and recording the peak score (best of the subsequent 3 measurement trials) to accurately reflect the athlete's true capacity is highly recommended for coaches and testing specialists to maximize measurement reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1939112
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Within-session test specific calibration in the T-agility test

Mürşit Aksoy, Yusuf Dilbilir, Davut Seyitoğulları
Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Within-session test specific calibration in the T-agility test

Mürşit Aksoy, Yusuf Dilbilir, Davut Seyitoğulları
article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine the minimum familiarization threshold (test-specific calibration) required to measure true performance capacity in the T-agility test and to mathematically demonstrate the systematic bias during this process. The high performance variability observed in the initial trials of agility tests stems from a cognitive and neuromotor calibration process where the athlete attempts to adapt to the test boundaries and rules, rather than from physical inadequacy. Thirty-four youth athletes with team-sport backgrounds (age: 16.12 ± 0.81 years) who were entirely naive to the standardized T-test protocol were included in the study. To optimally minimize the effects of fatigue, the athletes performed 9 consecutive successful T-test trials with 4-minute full recovery periods between each repetition. The obtained data were analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The results indicated that the athletes' performance times improved significantly from the first trial (T1) to the sixth trial (T6). However, no statistically significant difference was detected among the T6, T7, T8, and T9 measurements, indicating that performance stabilized during this 4-trial plateau phase. A substantial systematic bias of 2.89 seconds was found between the participants' initial trial (T1) and their achieved peak score (Tpeak). Consequently, to allow athletes to reflect their true agility levels with optimally minimized fatigue and the novice reaction, we strongly recommend completing a calibration process of at least 5 repetitions at the beginning of the test. Based on these findings, the '5+3 Protocol'—which involves regarding the first 5 trials as familiarization to be excluded, and recording the peak score (best of the subsequent 3 measurement trials) to accurately reflect the athlete's true capacity is highly recommended for coaches and testing specialists to maximize measurement reliability.

Turkish Journal of Kinesiology(Advanced Online Publication)
Hakkari University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.