Polymer-Enabled Additive Manufacturing for Personalized Drug Delivery and Diagnostic Platforms: Materials, Architectures, Quality Control and Clinical Translation

Polymer-based three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved from a prototyping approach toward a manufacturing strategy with emerging clinical relevance for individualized dosage forms, local drug depots, microneedle systems, microfluidic cartridges, biosensor housings and integrated theranostic platforms. Its value arises from the simultaneous control of polymer chemistry, device architecture and process history: infill, porosity, shell thickness, crosslink density, swelling, degradation and surface chemistry can be used as design variables rather than incidental manufacturing outcomes. This review critically synthesizes recent progress in polymer-enabled additive manufacturing for drug delivery and diagnostic applications, with emphasis on thermoplastic and biodegradable polymers, hydrogels, photopolymers, elastomers, conductive composites, stimuli-responsive networks and bioinks. Fused deposition modelling, hot-melt extrusion, semi-solid extrusion, vat photopolymerization, two-photon polymerization, selective laser sintering, binder jetting and inkjet/aerosol jet approaches are compared in relation to drug stability, diagnostic compatibility, feature resolution, scalability and regulatory risk. Particular attention is given to geometry-controlled release, multi-drug printlets, microneedles, implants, scaffold-based local therapy, microfluidic diagnostics, electrochemical biosensors and wearable or closed-loop systems. Translation is discussed through quality-by-design, critical material attributes, critical process parameters, process analytical technology, extractables/leachables, sterilization, point-of-care manufacturing, data integrity and clinical evidence requirements. Future advances should connect polymer–process–property relationships with clinically meaningful use cases, verified quality attributes and realistic regulatory pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18172053
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polymer-Enabled Additive Manufacturing for Personalized Drug Delivery and Diagnostic Platforms: Materials, Architectures, Quality Control and Clinical Translation

Arvind Kumar Shukla, Arulkumar Nagappan, Veeran Sethuraman, P. Parthiban
Polymers
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Polymer-Enabled Additive Manufacturing for Personalized Drug Delivery and Diagnostic Platforms: Materials, Architectures, Quality Control and Clinical Translation

Arvind Kumar Shukla, Arulkumar Nagappan, Veeran Sethuraman, P. Parthiban
article en

Abstract

Polymer-based three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved from a prototyping approach toward a manufacturing strategy with emerging clinical relevance for individualized dosage forms, local drug depots, microneedle systems, microfluidic cartridges, biosensor housings and integrated theranostic platforms. Its value arises from the simultaneous control of polymer chemistry, device architecture and process history: infill, porosity, shell thickness, crosslink density, swelling, degradation and surface chemistry can be used as design variables rather than incidental manufacturing outcomes. This review critically synthesizes recent progress in polymer-enabled additive manufacturing for drug delivery and diagnostic applications, with emphasis on thermoplastic and biodegradable polymers, hydrogels, photopolymers, elastomers, conductive composites, stimuli-responsive networks and bioinks. Fused deposition modelling, hot-melt extrusion, semi-solid extrusion, vat photopolymerization, two-photon polymerization, selective laser sintering, binder jetting and inkjet/aerosol jet approaches are compared in relation to drug stability, diagnostic compatibility, feature resolution, scalability and regulatory risk. Particular attention is given to geometry-controlled release, multi-drug printlets, microneedles, implants, scaffold-based local therapy, microfluidic diagnostics, electrochemical biosensors and wearable or closed-loop systems. Translation is discussed through quality-by-design, critical material attributes, critical process parameters, process analytical technology, extractables/leachables, sterilization, point-of-care manufacturing, data integrity and clinical evidence requirements. Future advances should connect polymer–process–property relationships with clinically meaningful use cases, verified quality attributes and realistic regulatory pathways.

PolymersVol. 18(17)
Pusan National University (KR), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.