Predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) represent potentially difficult subgroup, as they are prone to chronic critical illness characterized by persistent organ dysfunction. Maintaining vital functions in these patients often requires vasopressor therapy and mechanical ventilation that is associated with adverse outcomes. Identifying the predictors of these interventions is essential for risk stratification and intensive care planning. Objective. To assess the risk factors and develop a model for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy according to admission data in patients with chronic critical illness and traumatic brain injury. Material and methods. We analyzed real-world clinical data using the Russian Intensive Care Database (RICD). Demographic and clinical data on patients within 48 hours after admission (anamnesis, laboratory parameters, and scores) were extracted from the RICD database, and in-hospital outcomes were also taken into account. Results. To predict the need for mechanical ventilation, we included 188 patients. Of these, 25 (13.3%) patients required mechanical ventilation. To predict the need for vasopressor support, we enrolled 244 patients, and 39 (16.0%) ones required vasopressor therapy. We identified significant risk factors for the outcomes using univariate and multivariate analysis. Three parameters (serum albumin, polytrauma and anemia upon admission) were included in nomogram for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation. AUC (predictive accuracy of the model) was 0.753 (95% CI 0.645; 0.862). Regarding the need for vasopressor therapy, univariate and multivariate analyses established only one risk factor (low albumin concentration) with AUC 0.650 (95% CI 0.555; 0.746). The cutoff point was 31.1 g/L. Conclusion. Analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury in chronic critical illness revealed high probability of necessary respiratory and hemodynamic support. This need increased along with prolonged hospital-stay. Low serum albumin on admission was a key predictor of these interventions and highlighted potential prognostic significance of triad of inflammation, hypercatabolism and immunosuppression. Our results demonstrate limitations of left-sided prediction models and the need to develop new right-sided approaches taking into account dynamics of chronic critical illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202604126
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury

D.L. Kolesov, А. А. Яковлев, Берикашвили Леван Бондоевич, Valery V. Likhvantsev et al.
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury

D.L. Kolesov, А. А. Яковлев, Берикашвили Леван Бондоевич, Valery V. Likhvantsev, Artem N. Kuzovlev, Petr A. Polyakov, M. Ya. Yadgarov
article en

Abstract

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) represent potentially difficult subgroup, as they are prone to chronic critical illness characterized by persistent organ dysfunction. Maintaining vital functions in these patients often requires vasopressor therapy and mechanical ventilation that is associated with adverse outcomes. Identifying the predictors of these interventions is essential for risk stratification and intensive care planning. Objective. To assess the risk factors and develop a model for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy according to admission data in patients with chronic critical illness and traumatic brain injury. Material and methods. We analyzed real-world clinical data using the Russian Intensive Care Database (RICD). Demographic and clinical data on patients within 48 hours after admission (anamnesis, laboratory parameters, and scores) were extracted from the RICD database, and in-hospital outcomes were also taken into account. Results. To predict the need for mechanical ventilation, we included 188 patients. Of these, 25 (13.3%) patients required mechanical ventilation. To predict the need for vasopressor support, we enrolled 244 patients, and 39 (16.0%) ones required vasopressor therapy. We identified significant risk factors for the outcomes using univariate and multivariate analysis. Three parameters (serum albumin, polytrauma and anemia upon admission) were included in nomogram for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation. AUC (predictive accuracy of the model) was 0.753 (95% CI 0.645; 0.862). Regarding the need for vasopressor therapy, univariate and multivariate analyses established only one risk factor (low albumin concentration) with AUC 0.650 (95% CI 0.555; 0.746). The cutoff point was 31.1 g/L. Conclusion. Analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury in chronic critical illness revealed high probability of necessary respiratory and hemodynamic support. This need increased along with prolonged hospital-stay. Low serum albumin on admission was a key predictor of these interventions and highlighted potential prognostic significance of triad of inflammation, hypercatabolism and immunosuppression. Our results demonstrate limitations of left-sided prediction models and the need to develop new right-sided approaches taking into account dynamics of chronic critical illness.

Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology(4)
V.A. Negovsky Scientific Research Institute of General Reanimatology (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.