Routine Preoperative Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy Before Roux‐En‐Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From Queensland, Australia

ABSTRACT Introduction The role of routine preoperative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (POOGD) with routine biopsies prior to Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial. Whether POOGD should be routinely offered or reserved for symptomatic and/or at‐risk patients is heavily debated. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients undergoing RYGB in whom POOGD altered surgical management. Methods A retrospective review of medical records from 2016 to 2024 was performed using data from Surgery Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, POOGD findings, and operative outcomes were collected. POOGD findings were categorised as benign (e.g., oesophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcer disease [PUD], hiatus hernia [HH]) or premalignant (e.g., intestinal metaplasia [IM], Barrett's oesophagus [BO] and Helicobacter pylori infection [HP]). Results A total of 423 patients were planned to undergo RYGB; 346 (81.8%) were female. The majority of patients had three or more comorbidities (81.8%) and a preoperative BMI of 35 kg/m 2 (88.2%). POOGD identified abnormalities in 338 patients (80.0%), including benign findings in 235 (55.6%) and premalignant findings in 103 (24.3%). The most common benign findings were oesophagitis (184, 43.5%) and gastritis (175, 41.4%). IM was identified in 54 patients (12.8%), including three (0.7%) with corpus involvement. Amongst patients with premalignant findings, 32 (31.1%) were asymptomatic. POOGD findings altered surgical management in 18 patients (4.2%): 14 (3.3%) underwent RYGB plus resection of the remnant stomach (RRS), two (0.5%) experienced a delay due to untreated PUD, and two (0.5%) were offered an alternative bariatric procedure. Four hundred and five patients (95.7%) proceeded with RYGB as planned. Conclusion RYGB alters gastric anatomy, rendering the remnant stomach inaccessible postoperatively. Preoperative detection of premalignant lesions may be uncommon but clinically valuable, particularly given that such findings can be asymptomatic and may represent precursors to gastric adenocarcinoma. Considering its safety, diagnostic value, and potential to alter surgical management, the findings of this study support the routine use of POOGD with routine biopsies prior to RYGB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70927
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Preoperative Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy Before Roux‐En‐Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From Queensland, Australia

Michael Hatzifotis, Shahab Valizadehzare
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Routine Preoperative Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy Before Roux‐En‐Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From Queensland, Australia

Michael Hatzifotis, Shahab Valizadehzare
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The role of routine preoperative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (POOGD) with routine biopsies prior to Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial. Whether POOGD should be routinely offered or reserved for symptomatic and/or at‐risk patients is heavily debated. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients undergoing RYGB in whom POOGD altered surgical management. Methods A retrospective review of medical records from 2016 to 2024 was performed using data from Surgery Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, POOGD findings, and operative outcomes were collected. POOGD findings were categorised as benign (e.g., oesophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcer disease [PUD], hiatus hernia [HH]) or premalignant (e.g., intestinal metaplasia [IM], Barrett's oesophagus [BO] and Helicobacter pylori infection [HP]). Results A total of 423 patients were planned to undergo RYGB; 346 (81.8%) were female. The majority of patients had three or more comorbidities (81.8%) and a preoperative BMI of 35 kg/m 2 (88.2%). POOGD identified abnormalities in 338 patients (80.0%), including benign findings in 235 (55.6%) and premalignant findings in 103 (24.3%). The most common benign findings were oesophagitis (184, 43.5%) and gastritis (175, 41.4%). IM was identified in 54 patients (12.8%), including three (0.7%) with corpus involvement. Amongst patients with premalignant findings, 32 (31.1%) were asymptomatic. POOGD findings altered surgical management in 18 patients (4.2%): 14 (3.3%) underwent RYGB plus resection of the remnant stomach (RRS), two (0.5%) experienced a delay due to untreated PUD, and two (0.5%) were offered an alternative bariatric procedure. Four hundred and five patients (95.7%) proceeded with RYGB as planned. Conclusion RYGB alters gastric anatomy, rendering the remnant stomach inaccessible postoperatively. Preoperative detection of premalignant lesions may be uncommon but clinically valuable, particularly given that such findings can be asymptomatic and may represent precursors to gastric adenocarcinoma. Considering its safety, diagnostic value, and potential to alter surgical management, the findings of this study support the routine use of POOGD with routine biopsies prior to RYGB.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
The University of Queensland (AU), Greenslopes Private Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.