Narratives for transnational mobilization? The effects of food safety narratives in four EU countries

Abstract Does narrative communication in petitions help to promote awareness and action regarding food safety issues across Europe? We present comparative experimental survey data (N = 4,400) from four European Union (EU) countries (Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Spain) and show that participants took note of non-fictional narratives in two petition texts about two different issues (pesticides in agriculture and meat consumption). Exposure to the narrative petitions increased transportation, but mediation analysis indicated that transportation did not substantially promote willingness to sign the petition, and that food safety narratives only promoted petition signatures in one of the four countries (Germany). However, the mediating mechanism appears to hinge on self-reported EU-level efficacy, which partially promoted narrative-consistent petition signing in the Czech Republic. We discuss possible reasons for the mixed results and offer recommendations for campaigns on food safety policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2025-0022
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narratives for transnational mobilization? The effects of food safety narratives in four EU countries

Paola Mattei, Jale Tosun, Pablo Porten-Cheé, Vilém Novotný
Communications
Risk Perception and Management
article

Narratives for transnational mobilization? The effects of food safety narratives in four EU countries

Paola Mattei, Jale Tosun, Pablo Porten-Cheé, Vilém Novotný
article en

Abstract

Abstract Does narrative communication in petitions help to promote awareness and action regarding food safety issues across Europe? We present comparative experimental survey data (N = 4,400) from four European Union (EU) countries (Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Spain) and show that participants took note of non-fictional narratives in two petition texts about two different issues (pesticides in agriculture and meat consumption). Exposure to the narrative petitions increased transportation, but mediation analysis indicated that transportation did not substantially promote willingness to sign the petition, and that food safety narratives only promoted petition signatures in one of the four countries (Germany). However, the mediating mechanism appears to hinge on self-reported EU-level efficacy, which partially promoted narrative-consistent petition signing in the Czech Republic. We discuss possible reasons for the mixed results and offer recommendations for campaigns on food safety policy.

Communications
University of Milan (IT), Charles University (CZ), Heidelberg University (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.