Discharge Simulation Evaluations of ISIMIP3a Global Hydrological Models in the Yangtze River Basin

Global hydrological models (GHMs) are essential for assessing water resources and flood risk, yet systematic evaluations of ISIMIP3a models remain limited. We evaluated eight standard ISIMIP3a GHM configurations against observed discharge at four principal Yangtze mainstem gauges using a multi-metric framework covering daily and monthly discharge, the seasonal cycle (defined as the mean annual cycle of monthly discharge), flow percentiles, and annual peak discharge. Metric-based model performance generally increased from daily to monthly and seasonal-cycle scales, partly reflecting the smoothing of short-term errors through temporal aggregation, whereas annual peak discharge remained more difficult to reproduce. WaterGAP2-2e achieved the strongest overall performance across the daily, monthly, and seasonal-cycle evaluations. However, this result was not fully independent of its inherited global discharge calibration, because three evaluation gauges (Yichang, Hankou, and Datong) spatially coincide with gauges in its calibration-station dataset. WaterGAP2-2e also systematically overestimated peak flows, with peak-flow Relative Bias (RBpeak) reaching 30.14%. Among the remaining configurations, WEB-DHM-SG showed the strongest overall performance and a relatively small station-averaged absolute peak-flow bias (|RBpeak| = 15.52%). However, this advantage did not extend to low-flow conditions. H08 and ORCHIDEE-MICT showed the weakest overall performance, with negative NSE values down to −3.61 and peak-flow biases reaching −99.10%, whereas MIROC-INTEG-LAND, CWatM, HydroPy, and JULES-W2-DDM30 showed intermediate performance. Overall, model suitability depended on temporal scale and flow regime, and apparent rankings should be interpreted in light of inherited calibration and configuration differences. These results provide a diagnostic basis for model selection and targeted improvement in regional discharge simulation and peak-flow-related applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18172076
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discharge Simulation Evaluations of ISIMIP3a Global Hydrological Models in the Yangtze River Basin

Yanpeng Cai, Libin Lu, Wei Qi, Qian Tan
Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Discharge Simulation Evaluations of ISIMIP3a Global Hydrological Models in the Yangtze River Basin

Yanpeng Cai, Libin Lu, Wei Qi, Qian Tan
article en

Abstract

Global hydrological models (GHMs) are essential for assessing water resources and flood risk, yet systematic evaluations of ISIMIP3a models remain limited. We evaluated eight standard ISIMIP3a GHM configurations against observed discharge at four principal Yangtze mainstem gauges using a multi-metric framework covering daily and monthly discharge, the seasonal cycle (defined as the mean annual cycle of monthly discharge), flow percentiles, and annual peak discharge. Metric-based model performance generally increased from daily to monthly and seasonal-cycle scales, partly reflecting the smoothing of short-term errors through temporal aggregation, whereas annual peak discharge remained more difficult to reproduce. WaterGAP2-2e achieved the strongest overall performance across the daily, monthly, and seasonal-cycle evaluations. However, this result was not fully independent of its inherited global discharge calibration, because three evaluation gauges (Yichang, Hankou, and Datong) spatially coincide with gauges in its calibration-station dataset. WaterGAP2-2e also systematically overestimated peak flows, with peak-flow Relative Bias (RBpeak) reaching 30.14%. Among the remaining configurations, WEB-DHM-SG showed the strongest overall performance and a relatively small station-averaged absolute peak-flow bias (|RBpeak| = 15.52%). However, this advantage did not extend to low-flow conditions. H08 and ORCHIDEE-MICT showed the weakest overall performance, with negative NSE values down to −3.61 and peak-flow biases reaching −99.10%, whereas MIROC-INTEG-LAND, CWatM, HydroPy, and JULES-W2-DDM30 showed intermediate performance. Overall, model suitability depended on temporal scale and flow regime, and apparent rankings should be interpreted in light of inherited calibration and configuration differences. These results provide a diagnostic basis for model selection and targeted improvement in regional discharge simulation and peak-flow-related applications.

WaterVol. 18(17)
Guangdong Ocean University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.