Mechanism-Driven Evolution of Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Precision Management of Special Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Review

Endometrial cancer is increasingly diagnosed in patients who have not yet completed childbearing. For carefully selected patients with grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma confined to the endometrium, fertility-sparing treatment (FST) can preserve reproductive potential but requires rigorous histologic surveillance. In eligible patients, oral progestins and/or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain the mainstay of fertility-sparing treatment, with hysteroscopic lesion resection incorporated in selected cases. Obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, abnormalities in glucose metabolism, molecular subtype, and primary or acquired progestin resistance collectively contribute to heterogeneity in treatment response and the risk of recurrence. This narrative review critically integrates current guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective cohorts, and early exploratory evidence to evaluate the biological rationale, clinical positioning, efficacy, safety, and maturity of evidence for progestin-based therapy, metabolic interventions, combined endocrine approaches, molecularly guided strategies, and exploratory immunotherapeutic approaches. We further propose an integrated clinical pathway encompassing candidate selection, molecular assessment, response evaluation, transition to pregnancy, retreatment after recurrence, and timely conversion to definitive surgery. Importantly, this review distinguishes guideline-supported approaches from adjunctive, investigational, and exploratory strategies. Major evidence gaps include inconsistent definitions of treatment response, limited prospective molecularly stratified data, uncertain reproductive safety of emerging systemic therapies, and insufficient long-term data on pregnancy outcomes and offspring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172741
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanism-Driven Evolution of Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Precision Management of Special Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Review

Yumei Wu, Yue He, Shubo Wang, Ming-Yue Zhang et al.
Cancers
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Mechanism-Driven Evolution of Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Precision Management of Special Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Review

Yumei Wu, Yue He, Shubo Wang, Ming-Yue Zhang, Chun-Lin Pan, Zhuo-Ying Du, Shu-Li Yang, Kai-Bing Qu, Jian-Dong Wang
article en

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is increasingly diagnosed in patients who have not yet completed childbearing. For carefully selected patients with grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma confined to the endometrium, fertility-sparing treatment (FST) can preserve reproductive potential but requires rigorous histologic surveillance. In eligible patients, oral progestins and/or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain the mainstay of fertility-sparing treatment, with hysteroscopic lesion resection incorporated in selected cases. Obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, abnormalities in glucose metabolism, molecular subtype, and primary or acquired progestin resistance collectively contribute to heterogeneity in treatment response and the risk of recurrence. This narrative review critically integrates current guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective cohorts, and early exploratory evidence to evaluate the biological rationale, clinical positioning, efficacy, safety, and maturity of evidence for progestin-based therapy, metabolic interventions, combined endocrine approaches, molecularly guided strategies, and exploratory immunotherapeutic approaches. We further propose an integrated clinical pathway encompassing candidate selection, molecular assessment, response evaluation, transition to pregnancy, retreatment after recurrence, and timely conversion to definitive surgery. Importantly, this review distinguishes guideline-supported approaches from adjunctive, investigational, and exploratory strategies. Major evidence gaps include inconsistent definitions of treatment response, limited prospective molecularly stratified data, uncertain reproductive safety of emerging systemic therapies, and insufficient long-term data on pregnancy outcomes and offspring.

CancersVol. 18(17)
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.