Effect of megadose vitamin C in patients with sepsis: the CEMVIS randomized clinical trial

Previous randomized trials of vitamin C in sepsis have reported conflicting findings, but whether the effect of vitamin C varies according to septic shock status remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of megadose vitamin C in sepsis and explore whether treatment effect differed according to septic shock status. CEMVIS was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in four tertiary hospitals in China. Adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous vitamin C (12 g every 12 h for 4 days) or placebo using stratified randomization according to septic shock status. Patients were analyzed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Between Feb 8, 2022, and Dec 25, 2024, 114 patients in the vitamin C group and 117 in the placebo group were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 28-day mortality did not differ significantly between groups (35/114 [30.7%] vs 36/116 [31.0%]; odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.56–1.74; p = 0.97). No significant differences were observed in the duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, and renal replacement therapy, or in changes in SOFA scores over 96 hours. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed significant interaction according to septic shock status (P for interaction = 0.026), with the treatment effects on 28-day mortality numerically favoring vitamin C among patients without septic shock (15.4% vs 34%) and numerically favoring placebo among those with septic shock (38.7% vs 29%). Hypernatremia occurred more frequently in the vitamin C group (40/114 [35.1%] vs 24/117 [20.5%]; p = 0.02). Exploratory restricted cubic spline analyses showed that increasing lactate levels were associated with a progressive shift in treatment effect from potential benefit toward potential harm. Post hoc Bayesian analyses further provided probabilistic characterization of the potential treatment effect according to septic shock status. The results of this trial do not support the routine use of megadose vitamin C to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Treatment effects may vary according to septic shock status. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 3 January 2022 (identifier: NCT05194189).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06280-7
Primary Topic
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of megadose vitamin C in patients with sepsis: the CEMVIS randomized clinical trial

Jianbin Guan, 莫碧华, Dezhi Zeng, Ru Yang et al.
Critical Care
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
article

Effect of megadose vitamin C in patients with sepsis: the CEMVIS randomized clinical trial

Jianbin Guan, 莫碧华, Dezhi Zeng, Ru Yang, Limei Chen, Wenjuan Peng, Zhanguo Liu, Guoneng Gan, Haozhao Huang, Guizhong Wang, Shaowu Chen, Xiaoqin Cheng, Hongbin Hu, Xifan Yang, Ruixia Huang, Zhihui Liang, Miaolian Chen, Yingxin Tang, Zhenhua Zeng, Shaoqing Cai, Wei Peng
article en

Abstract

Previous randomized trials of vitamin C in sepsis have reported conflicting findings, but whether the effect of vitamin C varies according to septic shock status remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of megadose vitamin C in sepsis and explore whether treatment effect differed according to septic shock status. CEMVIS was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in four tertiary hospitals in China. Adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous vitamin C (12 g every 12 h for 4 days) or placebo using stratified randomization according to septic shock status. Patients were analyzed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Between Feb 8, 2022, and Dec 25, 2024, 114 patients in the vitamin C group and 117 in the placebo group were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 28-day mortality did not differ significantly between groups (35/114 [30.7%] vs 36/116 [31.0%]; odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.56–1.74; p = 0.97). No significant differences were observed in the duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, and renal replacement therapy, or in changes in SOFA scores over 96 hours. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed significant interaction according to septic shock status (P for interaction = 0.026), with the treatment effects on 28-day mortality numerically favoring vitamin C among patients without septic shock (15.4% vs 34%) and numerically favoring placebo among those with septic shock (38.7% vs 29%). Hypernatremia occurred more frequently in the vitamin C group (40/114 [35.1%] vs 24/117 [20.5%]; p = 0.02). Exploratory restricted cubic spline analyses showed that increasing lactate levels were associated with a progressive shift in treatment effect from potential benefit toward potential harm. Post hoc Bayesian analyses further provided probabilistic characterization of the potential treatment effect according to septic shock status. The results of this trial do not support the routine use of megadose vitamin C to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Treatment effects may vary according to septic shock status. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 3 January 2022 (identifier: NCT05194189).

Critical Care
Yuncheng University (CN), Nanfang Hospital (CN), Zhongshan People's Hospital (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), Foshan Second People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.