Carbon Footprint and Energy Use of Road Tunnel Construction: A Systematic LCA Review and Case Study of Poland

Road tunnels are highly carbon-intensive due to material use, energy-intensive construction, and long service lives, yet major gaps remain regarding emission hotspots, construction method comparisons, and regional differences, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe. This article combines a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature synthesis with a Polish case-study life-cycle assessment (ISO 14040/14044, cradle to grave, functional unit of 1 m of tunnel, 100-year horizon) using Ecoinvent factors and the Polish energy mix, covering material production, construction, operation, maintenance, and end of life. The literature synthesis found substantial variability in tunnel carbon emissions, ranging from 1500 to 22,062 t CO2-eq per lane-kilometer depending on the construction method, tunnel type, and region. Material production was the largest contributor to construction-phase emissions (70–95%), with concrete and steel responsible for over 90% of material-phase impacts and 75–80% of construction-phase emissions, while operational energy use dominates over the full life cycle. Concrete and steel substitution (e.g., GFRP bars and calcium sulfoaluminate cement) offers the greatest construction-phase reduction potential, while operational measures, such as LED lighting, demand-controlled ventilation, and renewable energy, can cut long-term energy use by 30–50%. For Poland, low-carbon concrete, prefabrication, and renewable electricity could reduce tunnel emissions by 40–60%. These findings highlight pathways for decarbonizing tunnel infrastructure through material innovation, energy-efficient operation, and circular economy principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18178675
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Footprint and Energy Use of Road Tunnel Construction: A Systematic LCA Review and Case Study of Poland

Marek Borowski, Klaudia Zwolińska-Glądys, Samson Femi Adesope
Sustainability
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Carbon Footprint and Energy Use of Road Tunnel Construction: A Systematic LCA Review and Case Study of Poland

Marek Borowski, Klaudia Zwolińska-Glądys, Samson Femi Adesope
article en

Abstract

Road tunnels are highly carbon-intensive due to material use, energy-intensive construction, and long service lives, yet major gaps remain regarding emission hotspots, construction method comparisons, and regional differences, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe. This article combines a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature synthesis with a Polish case-study life-cycle assessment (ISO 14040/14044, cradle to grave, functional unit of 1 m of tunnel, 100-year horizon) using Ecoinvent factors and the Polish energy mix, covering material production, construction, operation, maintenance, and end of life. The literature synthesis found substantial variability in tunnel carbon emissions, ranging from 1500 to 22,062 t CO2-eq per lane-kilometer depending on the construction method, tunnel type, and region. Material production was the largest contributor to construction-phase emissions (70–95%), with concrete and steel responsible for over 90% of material-phase impacts and 75–80% of construction-phase emissions, while operational energy use dominates over the full life cycle. Concrete and steel substitution (e.g., GFRP bars and calcium sulfoaluminate cement) offers the greatest construction-phase reduction potential, while operational measures, such as LED lighting, demand-controlled ventilation, and renewable energy, can cut long-term energy use by 30–50%. For Poland, low-carbon concrete, prefabrication, and renewable electricity could reduce tunnel emissions by 40–60%. These findings highlight pathways for decarbonizing tunnel infrastructure through material innovation, energy-efficient operation, and circular economy principles.

SustainabilityVol. 18(17)
Jagiellonian University (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon Footprint and Energy Use of Road Tunnel Construction: A Systematic LCA Review and Case Study of Poland — Marek Borowski, Klaudia Zwolińska-Glądys, et al. · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS