DELV-ing Into the Psychometrics of Dialect: An Item-Level Analysis With School-Aged African American Children

PURPOSE: Measuring language proficiency in the presence of nonmainstream dialect variation is a crucial task for clinicians and language researchers. Evaluations of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-Screening Test (DELV-ST) have suggested that its items do not conform to the recommended scoring rules. The current article evaluates the items from both parts of the DELV-ST. METHOD: Participants included 853 African American students in Grades 1-5. We used a priori confirmatory factor models to evaluate the published structure versus linguistically based blocks of items for the two parts of the DELV-ST: Language Variation (15 items) and Diagnostic Risk (17 items). We also evaluated models of full multinomial scoring of all item choices. RESULTS: = .28-.57). CONCLUSIONS: The items of the DELV-ST did not function well as unidimensional measures of their intended parts in the current sample. Some items and many responses did not function adequately, suggesting that for a better understanding of dialect, a wider variety of linguistic tasks with diagnostically informative responses may be needed. Relations between the DELV-ST and language or reading are therefore questionable. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33245943.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00745
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DELV-ing Into the Psychometrics of Dialect: An Item-Level Analysis With School-Aged African American Children

Katherine Rhodes, Julie A. Washington, Lee Branum‐Martin
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Language Development and Disorders
article

DELV-ing Into the Psychometrics of Dialect: An Item-Level Analysis With School-Aged African American Children

Katherine Rhodes, Julie A. Washington, Lee Branum‐Martin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Measuring language proficiency in the presence of nonmainstream dialect variation is a crucial task for clinicians and language researchers. Evaluations of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-Screening Test (DELV-ST) have suggested that its items do not conform to the recommended scoring rules. The current article evaluates the items from both parts of the DELV-ST. METHOD: Participants included 853 African American students in Grades 1-5. We used a priori confirmatory factor models to evaluate the published structure versus linguistically based blocks of items for the two parts of the DELV-ST: Language Variation (15 items) and Diagnostic Risk (17 items). We also evaluated models of full multinomial scoring of all item choices. RESULTS: = .28-.57). CONCLUSIONS: The items of the DELV-ST did not function well as unidimensional measures of their intended parts in the current sample. Some items and many responses did not function adequately, suggesting that for a better understanding of dialect, a wider variety of linguistic tasks with diagnostically informative responses may be needed. Relations between the DELV-ST and language or reading are therefore questionable. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33245943.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Georgia State University (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.