Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle

Lameness remains one of the most significant welfare and economic challenges in modern dairy production. Traditional detection methods, particularly visual locomotion scoring, are limited by subjectivity, inconsistent application, and infrequent monitoring, which often delays the recognition of painful lesions. This review synthesizes recent validation studies of automated lameness detection (ALD) technologies and evaluates their diagnostic performance, validation design, and practical implementation across dairy systems. Studies were screened for relevance by a single reviewer based on title, abstract, and full-text content. Included studies represented sensor-based, pressure-based, vision-based, and multimodal detection platforms, with reported accuracies ranging from approximately 70% to 98% depending on modality and environmental setting. Vision-based systems demonstrated strong performance in controlled conditions, whereas field-validated systems showed more moderate but potentially more generalizable accuracy. Pressure-based platforms reported high diagnostic discrimination via area under the curve (AUC) analysis but face infrastructural limitations in commercial settings. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated that controlled experimental studies without external validation may overestimate deployment performance. Despite technological advances, variability in validation protocols, lesion thresholds, and environmental robustness limits direct comparison across systems. Future research should prioritize multi-farm external validation, standardized benchmarking frameworks, and multimodal integration within precision livestock farming ecosystems to improve reliability and adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172643
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle

Chloe C. Hudson, Kelsey M Harvey, Molly Nicodemus, Madeline G. McKnight et al.
Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle

Chloe C. Hudson, Kelsey M Harvey, Molly Nicodemus, Madeline G. McKnight, Marcus McGee
article en

Abstract

Lameness remains one of the most significant welfare and economic challenges in modern dairy production. Traditional detection methods, particularly visual locomotion scoring, are limited by subjectivity, inconsistent application, and infrequent monitoring, which often delays the recognition of painful lesions. This review synthesizes recent validation studies of automated lameness detection (ALD) technologies and evaluates their diagnostic performance, validation design, and practical implementation across dairy systems. Studies were screened for relevance by a single reviewer based on title, abstract, and full-text content. Included studies represented sensor-based, pressure-based, vision-based, and multimodal detection platforms, with reported accuracies ranging from approximately 70% to 98% depending on modality and environmental setting. Vision-based systems demonstrated strong performance in controlled conditions, whereas field-validated systems showed more moderate but potentially more generalizable accuracy. Pressure-based platforms reported high diagnostic discrimination via area under the curve (AUC) analysis but face infrastructural limitations in commercial settings. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated that controlled experimental studies without external validation may overestimate deployment performance. Despite technological advances, variability in validation protocols, lesion thresholds, and environmental robustness limits direct comparison across systems. Future research should prioritize multi-farm external validation, standardized benchmarking frameworks, and multimodal integration within precision livestock farming ecosystems to improve reliability and adoption.

AnimalsVol. 16(17)
Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.