Explicit instruction and history teaching: clarifying knowledge or constraining inquiry?

Abstract In October of 2023, the announcement by NSW Secretary of Education Murat Dizdar signalled a policy shift towards explicit instruction, stating that explicit teaching should be used in every NSW classroom. This announcement again ignited public debate, intensified by media, regarding pedagogical approaches in schools. Primarily, media debates about teachers and schools in the main have circulated about what content is taught, this statement can be seen to have shifted the public discourse to how teachers teach. Within this debate, explicit instruction is promoted as the preferred approach. This paper argues that while explicit instruction offers a significant benefit for learning in History and the Humanities, it should not be framed as an either/or pedagogical choice. Rather, explicit instruction can be embedded within clear and rigorous inquiry-based learning principles that support disciplinary understanding and student engagement, without undermining the professional autonomy of teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Curriculum Perspectives
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-026-00335-z
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explicit instruction and history teaching: clarifying knowledge or constraining inquiry?

Heather Sharp, Melanie Innes
Curriculum Perspectives
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

Explicit instruction and history teaching: clarifying knowledge or constraining inquiry?

Heather Sharp, Melanie Innes
article en

Abstract

Abstract In October of 2023, the announcement by NSW Secretary of Education Murat Dizdar signalled a policy shift towards explicit instruction, stating that explicit teaching should be used in every NSW classroom. This announcement again ignited public debate, intensified by media, regarding pedagogical approaches in schools. Primarily, media debates about teachers and schools in the main have circulated about what content is taught, this statement can be seen to have shifted the public discourse to how teachers teach. Within this debate, explicit instruction is promoted as the preferred approach. This paper argues that while explicit instruction offers a significant benefit for learning in History and the Humanities, it should not be framed as an either/or pedagogical choice. Rather, explicit instruction can be embedded within clear and rigorous inquiry-based learning principles that support disciplinary understanding and student engagement, without undermining the professional autonomy of teachers.

Curriculum Perspectives
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Newcastle University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.