A simple eye model for practicing retinal membrane peeling surgery

Abstract Background To develop and evaluate the educational utility of a simple eye model for retinal membrane peeling training. Methods A pilot, cross-sectional study included five ophthalmology trainees with prior intraocular surgery experience but no previous membrane peeling experience, and five vitreoretinal experts. A low-cost model was developed using a 60 ml syringe, reused microforceps, light probe, microscope, and vinegar-soaked chicken eggshells to simulate membrane peeling and related vitreoretinal surgical skills. Experts assessed the model’s realism using a 4-point scale. Novices completed pre- and post-task evaluation, after completing three prerequisite tasks: BIOM setup, microscopic adjustments, and micro-forceps proficiency. Membrane peeling performance was assessed for flap creation and complete membrane peeling. Pre-training and post-training novice scores were analyzed. Results Novices showed encouraging trends toward improved task performance. The mean membrane-peeling time decreased from 459.00 ± 299.26 to 238.60 ± 163.92 s ( P = 0.063). Improvements were also observed in the flap-creation score (0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.40 ± 0.89; P = 0.125), flap-creation time (67.80 ± 14.84 vs. 40.40 ± 47.26 s; P = 0.313), and membrane-peeling score (0.60 ± 0.55 vs. 1.60 ± 0.42; P = 0.125); however, none of these differences reached statistical significance. The model was rated as user-friendly and effective overall (2.60 ± 0.55 out of 3), particularly for BIOM assembly (2.80 ± 0.45 out of 3) and micro-forceps manipulation (2.40 ± 0.55 out of 3). Experts agreed that the model helped build surgical confidence (2.40 ± 0.89 out of 4). Realism was rated highly for BIOM assembly and mask setup (3.60 ± 0.55 and 3.40 ± 0.55 out of 4, respectively), whereas tactile feedback received moderate ratings (2.00 ± 1.22 out of 4); one expert rated it 3, and two rated it 2. Conclusions This simple eye model provides an accessible platform for practicing basic membrane-peeling tasks and has potential utility for developing membrane-peeling skills within a simulation setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00917-z
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A simple eye model for practicing retinal membrane peeling surgery

Nuttawut Rodanant, Chinnapat Montrisuksirikun, Simaporn Setthawong, Thanchanit Sawetratanastien et al.
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

A simple eye model for practicing retinal membrane peeling surgery

Nuttawut Rodanant, Chinnapat Montrisuksirikun, Simaporn Setthawong, Thanchanit Sawetratanastien, Supathida Jiamsawad, Nuttara Sapphaso
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To develop and evaluate the educational utility of a simple eye model for retinal membrane peeling training. Methods A pilot, cross-sectional study included five ophthalmology trainees with prior intraocular surgery experience but no previous membrane peeling experience, and five vitreoretinal experts. A low-cost model was developed using a 60 ml syringe, reused microforceps, light probe, microscope, and vinegar-soaked chicken eggshells to simulate membrane peeling and related vitreoretinal surgical skills. Experts assessed the model’s realism using a 4-point scale. Novices completed pre- and post-task evaluation, after completing three prerequisite tasks: BIOM setup, microscopic adjustments, and micro-forceps proficiency. Membrane peeling performance was assessed for flap creation and complete membrane peeling. Pre-training and post-training novice scores were analyzed. Results Novices showed encouraging trends toward improved task performance. The mean membrane-peeling time decreased from 459.00 ± 299.26 to 238.60 ± 163.92 s ( P = 0.063). Improvements were also observed in the flap-creation score (0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.40 ± 0.89; P = 0.125), flap-creation time (67.80 ± 14.84 vs. 40.40 ± 47.26 s; P = 0.313), and membrane-peeling score (0.60 ± 0.55 vs. 1.60 ± 0.42; P = 0.125); however, none of these differences reached statistical significance. The model was rated as user-friendly and effective overall (2.60 ± 0.55 out of 3), particularly for BIOM assembly (2.80 ± 0.45 out of 3) and micro-forceps manipulation (2.40 ± 0.55 out of 3). Experts agreed that the model helped build surgical confidence (2.40 ± 0.89 out of 4). Realism was rated highly for BIOM assembly and mask setup (3.60 ± 0.55 and 3.40 ± 0.55 out of 4, respectively), whereas tactile feedback received moderate ratings (2.00 ± 1.22 out of 4); one expert rated it 3, and two rated it 2. Conclusions This simple eye model provides an accessible platform for practicing basic membrane-peeling tasks and has potential utility for developing membrane-peeling skills within a simulation setting.

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Siriraj Hospital (TH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.