Is Chronotype Related to Eating Distractions Among Adolescents? The EHDLA Study

Background: Screen-based distractions during meals are increasingly common during adolescence and have been linked to less healthy eating behaviors. Chronotype, an individual’s circadian preference for morningness or eveningness, is associated with differences in alertness, self-regulation, and recreational screen use across the day, which may in turn influence susceptibility to distractions during meals. However, the relationship between chronotype and eating distraction behaviors remains largely unexplored. Therefore, this study examined the association between chronotype and eating distraction behaviors in Spanish adolescents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in 820 adolescents aged 12–17 years from the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities (EHDLA) project. Chronotype was assessed using the Morningness–Eveningness Scale for Children and classified as evening, intermediate, or morning type. Eating distractions were evaluated using a composite score that included eating lunch or dinner while watching television, using mobile devices or social networks during meals, and eating while standing. Associations were examined using ordinal regression models (proportional odds), with eveningness as the reference category; both unadjusted and adjusted models are reported, with adjustment for relevant sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates. Results: In adjusted ordinal regression models with eveningness as reference, morningness was related to lower odds of being in a higher eating distractions category (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.82; p = 0.004). Morningness was also associated with lower odds of a higher category of television viewing during meals (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.38–0.93; p = 0.024). No significant associations were identified for eating while using a phone or social networks or for eating while standing. Conclusions: Chronotype was independently associated with eating distraction behaviors in Spanish adolescents, with evening types showing a less favorable pattern. These findings suggest that circadian preference may be relevant when addressing mealtime behaviors during adolescence and could help inform future health promotion strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18172763
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Chronotype Related to Eating Distractions Among Adolescents? The EHDLA Study

Emily Cisneros-Vásquez, Rodrigo Alejandro Yañez Sepulveda, Camila Miño, Miguel López‐Moreno et al.
Nutrients
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Is Chronotype Related to Eating Distractions Among Adolescents? The EHDLA Study

Emily Cisneros-Vásquez, Rodrigo Alejandro Yañez Sepulveda, Camila Miño, Miguel López‐Moreno, José Francisco López‐Gil, José Adrián Montenegro-Espinosa, Fiorella Quiroz-Cárdenas, Martina Jared Masache-Cruz, Chih-Fu Wei, Lucille Ridgell
article en

Abstract

Background: Screen-based distractions during meals are increasingly common during adolescence and have been linked to less healthy eating behaviors. Chronotype, an individual’s circadian preference for morningness or eveningness, is associated with differences in alertness, self-regulation, and recreational screen use across the day, which may in turn influence susceptibility to distractions during meals. However, the relationship between chronotype and eating distraction behaviors remains largely unexplored. Therefore, this study examined the association between chronotype and eating distraction behaviors in Spanish adolescents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in 820 adolescents aged 12–17 years from the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities (EHDLA) project. Chronotype was assessed using the Morningness–Eveningness Scale for Children and classified as evening, intermediate, or morning type. Eating distractions were evaluated using a composite score that included eating lunch or dinner while watching television, using mobile devices or social networks during meals, and eating while standing. Associations were examined using ordinal regression models (proportional odds), with eveningness as the reference category; both unadjusted and adjusted models are reported, with adjustment for relevant sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates. Results: In adjusted ordinal regression models with eveningness as reference, morningness was related to lower odds of being in a higher eating distractions category (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.82; p = 0.004). Morningness was also associated with lower odds of a higher category of television viewing during meals (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.38–0.93; p = 0.024). No significant associations were identified for eating while using a phone or social networks or for eating while standing. Conclusions: Chronotype was independently associated with eating distraction behaviors in Spanish adolescents, with evening types showing a less favorable pattern. These findings suggest that circadian preference may be relevant when addressing mealtime behaviors during adolescence and could help inform future health promotion strategies.

NutrientsVol. 18(17)
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (ES), University of Matanzas (CU), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Viña del Mar University (CL), Universidad Internacional (MX), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Instituto de Estudos Superiores de Fafe LDA (PT), Universidad Autónoma del Paraguay (PY), Universidad de Los Lagos (CL), Princess Margaret Hospital (TV), National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.