Prefabricated CAD/CAM zirconia membrane versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Horizontal ridge deficiencies in the anterior maxilla frequently compromise ideal implant positioning and esthetic outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes compared with conventional collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) performed simultaneously with early implant placement. METHODS: Twenty systemically healthy patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla underwent early implant placement (4-8 weeks after tooth extraction) combined with simultaneous contour augmentation using a composite graft of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (1:1). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a customized CAD/CAM zirconia membrane (test group, n = 10) or a double-layer collagen membrane (control group, n = 10). The primary outcome was horizontal bone gain (HBG) at 6 months, assessed by standardized CBCT superimposition. Secondary outcomes included soft tissue healing evaluated using the Modified Wound Healing Index (MWHI), membrane exposure (wound dehiscence), and patient-reported postoperative pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: All implants survived during the 6-month follow-up period (100% survival rate). Mean HBG was 6.18 ± 0.60 mm in the test group and 5.85 ± 0.37 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.158). Membrane exposure occurred in all patients receiving customized zirconia membranes (10/10, 100%), whereas no membrane exposure was observed in the collagen membrane group (0/10, 0%). Despite the higher exposure rate, graft stability and horizontal bone regeneration were not adversely affected. Soft tissue healing was significantly more favorable in the collagen membrane group. Postoperative pain decreased significantly over time in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: Customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes achieved horizontal bone augmentation comparable to conventional collagen membranes when used for simultaneous GBR during early implant placement. Although customized zirconia membranes were associated with a substantially higher membrane exposure rate, regenerative outcomes and implant survival remained unaffected, indicating that customized rigid barriers may represent a predictable alternative for horizontal ridge augmentation while offering potential advantages in surgical precision and procedural efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06987149.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-026-00711-4
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prefabricated CAD/CAM zirconia membrane versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial

YasserM El Makaky, Amr Mostafa Gabr, Mohamed H. Helal, Mohammed Mashhout Anas
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Prefabricated CAD/CAM zirconia membrane versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial

YasserM El Makaky, Amr Mostafa Gabr, Mohamed H. Helal, Mohammed Mashhout Anas
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Horizontal ridge deficiencies in the anterior maxilla frequently compromise ideal implant positioning and esthetic outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes compared with conventional collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) performed simultaneously with early implant placement. METHODS: Twenty systemically healthy patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla underwent early implant placement (4-8 weeks after tooth extraction) combined with simultaneous contour augmentation using a composite graft of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (1:1). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a customized CAD/CAM zirconia membrane (test group, n = 10) or a double-layer collagen membrane (control group, n = 10). The primary outcome was horizontal bone gain (HBG) at 6 months, assessed by standardized CBCT superimposition. Secondary outcomes included soft tissue healing evaluated using the Modified Wound Healing Index (MWHI), membrane exposure (wound dehiscence), and patient-reported postoperative pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: All implants survived during the 6-month follow-up period (100% survival rate). Mean HBG was 6.18 ± 0.60 mm in the test group and 5.85 ± 0.37 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.158). Membrane exposure occurred in all patients receiving customized zirconia membranes (10/10, 100%), whereas no membrane exposure was observed in the collagen membrane group (0/10, 0%). Despite the higher exposure rate, graft stability and horizontal bone regeneration were not adversely affected. Soft tissue healing was significantly more favorable in the collagen membrane group. Postoperative pain decreased significantly over time in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: Customized CAD/CAM zirconia membranes achieved horizontal bone augmentation comparable to conventional collagen membranes when used for simultaneous GBR during early implant placement. Although customized zirconia membranes were associated with a substantially higher membrane exposure rate, regenerative outcomes and implant survival remained unaffected, indicating that customized rigid barriers may represent a predictable alternative for horizontal ridge augmentation while offering potential advantages in surgical precision and procedural efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06987149.

International Journal of Implant DentistryVol. 12(1)
Tanta University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund, Tanta University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.