EXPRESS: Serendipity, strategy and psychic secretions: From general processes to individual differences

Pavlov observed that his dogs salivated not only when food was directly introduced into their mouths, but also when presented with other stimuli that had reliably co-occurred with food. This was a serendipitous observation. He called such cases of salivation psychic secretions or more prosaically conditional or conditioned responses. Our own research, born from a series of serendipitous interactions and findings, concerns reconciling general-process theories of associative learning with qualitative and quantitative individual differences in such conditioned behaviours; and in particular responses directed toward the conditioned stimulus (called sign-tracking) and those reflecting the unconditioned stimulus (called goal-tracking). The research is ongoing (i.e., incomplete), but has already prompted some revisions to received wisdom, including about the nature of associative structures involved, and the rules governing their acquisition and translation into behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261484941
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Serendipity, strategy and psychic secretions: From general processes to individual differences

R. C. Honey
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

EXPRESS: Serendipity, strategy and psychic secretions: From general processes to individual differences

R. C. Honey
article en

Abstract

Pavlov observed that his dogs salivated not only when food was directly introduced into their mouths, but also when presented with other stimuli that had reliably co-occurred with food. This was a serendipitous observation. He called such cases of salivation psychic secretions or more prosaically conditional or conditioned responses. Our own research, born from a series of serendipitous interactions and findings, concerns reconciling general-process theories of associative learning with qualitative and quantitative individual differences in such conditioned behaviours; and in particular responses directed toward the conditioned stimulus (called sign-tracking) and those reflecting the unconditioned stimulus (called goal-tracking). The research is ongoing (i.e., incomplete), but has already prompted some revisions to received wisdom, including about the nature of associative structures involved, and the rules governing their acquisition and translation into behaviour.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Cardiff University (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EXPRESS: Serendipity, strategy and psychic secretions: From general processes to individual differences — R. C. Honey · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS