First Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing D-Mannose to Fosfomycin in Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infections

Background/Objectives: Antibiotics are the recommended first-line therapy for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (cystitis), but antibiotic resistance and tolerability concerns require antibiotic-sparing strategies. This study evaluated D-mannose as a stand-alone alternative. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study compared D-mannose to fosfomycin in women aged 18–70 with cystitis. Clinical cure (CC) was assessed using the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) up to day 8, with non-inferiority tested at the 15% margin. Post hoc analytical approaches accounted for potential bias due to low sample sizes and missing values. Results: The study randomized 118 patients. At baseline, severe symptoms (ACSS ≥ 12) were more frequent in the D-mannose group compared to fosfomycin (32.8% vs. 22.8%). Efficacy analyses were performed on the per-protocol set (D-mannose: N = 57; fosfomycin: N = 54). Median time to CC was 5.0 days (D-mannose) and 3.0 days (fosfomycin) overall, and 4.0 days vs. 3.0 days in the subgroup of moderate disease severity. The point estimate for the CC rate difference on day 8 (−10.1%) favored fosfomycin but was within the non-inferiority margin. Due to wide confidence intervals, non-inferiority was not statistically confirmed. The post hoc analysis yielded smaller confidence intervals with estimated CC rates of 84.2% (D-mannose) vs. 83.5% (fosfomycin) on day 8 and statistically demonstrated the comparability of both treatments. Recurrence rates were similar (13.2% vs. 13.3%), and there was no statistically significant difference for additional antibiotic use (19.3% vs. 11.1%). Investigators and patients favored D-mannose over fosfomycin for tolerability, and gastrointestinal adverse events were less frequent (9.8% vs. 24.6%). Conclusions: Post hoc analysis indicated that D-mannose treatment is comparable to fosfomycin in uncomplicated cystitis in line with the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. These findings warrant confirmation in an adequately powered trial but suggest that D-mannose is a promising alternative to antibiotics given its favorable risk–benefit ratio.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15090820
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing D-Mannose to Fosfomycin in Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infections

H Taeschner, Nacera Infed, Oda Ewald, Florian Wagenlehner et al.
Antibiotics
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

First Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing D-Mannose to Fosfomycin in Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infections

H Taeschner, Nacera Infed, Oda Ewald, Florian Wagenlehner, Peter Gerke, Horst Lorenz, Anja Berwanger
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Antibiotics are the recommended first-line therapy for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (cystitis), but antibiotic resistance and tolerability concerns require antibiotic-sparing strategies. This study evaluated D-mannose as a stand-alone alternative. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study compared D-mannose to fosfomycin in women aged 18–70 with cystitis. Clinical cure (CC) was assessed using the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) up to day 8, with non-inferiority tested at the 15% margin. Post hoc analytical approaches accounted for potential bias due to low sample sizes and missing values. Results: The study randomized 118 patients. At baseline, severe symptoms (ACSS ≥ 12) were more frequent in the D-mannose group compared to fosfomycin (32.8% vs. 22.8%). Efficacy analyses were performed on the per-protocol set (D-mannose: N = 57; fosfomycin: N = 54). Median time to CC was 5.0 days (D-mannose) and 3.0 days (fosfomycin) overall, and 4.0 days vs. 3.0 days in the subgroup of moderate disease severity. The point estimate for the CC rate difference on day 8 (−10.1%) favored fosfomycin but was within the non-inferiority margin. Due to wide confidence intervals, non-inferiority was not statistically confirmed. The post hoc analysis yielded smaller confidence intervals with estimated CC rates of 84.2% (D-mannose) vs. 83.5% (fosfomycin) on day 8 and statistically demonstrated the comparability of both treatments. Recurrence rates were similar (13.2% vs. 13.3%), and there was no statistically significant difference for additional antibiotic use (19.3% vs. 11.1%). Investigators and patients favored D-mannose over fosfomycin for tolerability, and gastrointestinal adverse events were less frequent (9.8% vs. 24.6%). Conclusions: Post hoc analysis indicated that D-mannose treatment is comparable to fosfomycin in uncomplicated cystitis in line with the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. These findings warrant confirmation in an adequately powered trial but suggest that D-mannose is a promising alternative to antibiotics given its favorable risk–benefit ratio.

AntibioticsVol. 15(9)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie (DE), Klosterfrau Healthcare Group (Germany) (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.