Cultural Theory, Political Ideology, and Burden Tolerance: The Role of Core Beliefs in Shaping Support for Administrative Burdens

Administrative burdens embedded within many public policies are often politically contentious, such that core values and belief systems can drive either support or opposition. In this paper, we use survey data from US respondents to replicate and extend previous research on the public acceptance of administrative burdens in general. First, we confirm the measure's validity by examining its effects on beliefs across policies that range from highly polarized to less politically contentious. Second, we test the relationship between tolerance of administrative burden and cultural theory (CT) variables that tap into worldview orientations related to hierarchy, egalitarianism, individualism, and fatalism, which previous research has found predictive of policy preferences across a wide range of domains, even after accounting for political ideology and partisanship. We hypothesize that egalitarians and individualists will generally be less tolerant of burdens, while hierarchs will be more accepting of burdensome requirements. However, this effect varies depending on the nature of the burdens and how they relate to perceived threats for each worldview.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Review of Public Administration
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740261478906
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Theory, Political Ideology, and Burden Tolerance: The Role of Core Beliefs in Shaping Support for Administrative Burdens

Matthew C. Nowlin, Emily Mee, Thomas Rabovsky
The American Review of Public Administration
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Cultural Theory, Political Ideology, and Burden Tolerance: The Role of Core Beliefs in Shaping Support for Administrative Burdens

Matthew C. Nowlin, Emily Mee, Thomas Rabovsky
article en

Abstract

Administrative burdens embedded within many public policies are often politically contentious, such that core values and belief systems can drive either support or opposition. In this paper, we use survey data from US respondents to replicate and extend previous research on the public acceptance of administrative burdens in general. First, we confirm the measure's validity by examining its effects on beliefs across policies that range from highly polarized to less politically contentious. Second, we test the relationship between tolerance of administrative burden and cultural theory (CT) variables that tap into worldview orientations related to hierarchy, egalitarianism, individualism, and fatalism, which previous research has found predictive of policy preferences across a wide range of domains, even after accounting for political ideology and partisanship. We hypothesize that egalitarians and individualists will generally be less tolerant of burdens, while hierarchs will be more accepting of burdensome requirements. However, this effect varies depending on the nature of the burdens and how they relate to perceived threats for each worldview.

The American Review of Public Administration
The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Wichita State University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.