Unpacking Doctoral Education in China: An Exploratory Study of Student Experiences Across Conventional and Integrated Doctoral Programs

The growing demand for highly skilled professionals has driven significant innovations in doctoral education. Integrated doctoral programs accelerate the training process and promote specialized research by combining master’s and doctoral studies into a single pathway, which has driven widespread adoption worldwide. However, there is a gap in our understanding of how students who attend integrated doctoral programs experience their doctoral education. This study presents an exploratory analysis of doctoral students’ self-reported experiences across program types, focusing on supervision quality, mental well-being, career aspirations, and overall satisfaction. The study reports findings from a survey conducted among final-year doctoral students (N = 22,382) across 338 higher education institutions in China. The results reveal that students in integrated doctoral programs tend to report lower levels of overall satisfaction with their doctoral experience. Specifically, they indicate greater challenges related to doctoral supervision, higher levels of mental well-being concerns, and lower aspirations regarding academic careers. These findings suggest that to better support integrated doctoral students’ personal and professional development, educators and policymakers should focus on further leveraging the advantages of integration, refining admission criteria, and enhancing support systems at all levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Education & Society
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2026.2700992
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking Doctoral Education in China: An Exploratory Study of Student Experiences Across Conventional and Integrated Doctoral Programs

Zhao Shikui, Jiahui Du, Xuejiao Wu
Chinese Education & Society
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Unpacking Doctoral Education in China: An Exploratory Study of Student Experiences Across Conventional and Integrated Doctoral Programs

Zhao Shikui, Jiahui Du, Xuejiao Wu
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for highly skilled professionals has driven significant innovations in doctoral education. Integrated doctoral programs accelerate the training process and promote specialized research by combining master’s and doctoral studies into a single pathway, which has driven widespread adoption worldwide. However, there is a gap in our understanding of how students who attend integrated doctoral programs experience their doctoral education. This study presents an exploratory analysis of doctoral students’ self-reported experiences across program types, focusing on supervision quality, mental well-being, career aspirations, and overall satisfaction. The study reports findings from a survey conducted among final-year doctoral students (N = 22,382) across 338 higher education institutions in China. The results reveal that students in integrated doctoral programs tend to report lower levels of overall satisfaction with their doctoral experience. Specifically, they indicate greater challenges related to doctoral supervision, higher levels of mental well-being concerns, and lower aspirations regarding academic careers. These findings suggest that to better support integrated doctoral students’ personal and professional development, educators and policymakers should focus on further leveraging the advantages of integration, refining admission criteria, and enhancing support systems at all levels.

Chinese Education & Society
Beihang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.