AI-based disease severity grading predicts complications in laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis severity underpins contemporary management guidelines, where laparoscopic appendectomy remains gold standard. Preoperative measures poorly predict actual disease severity or complication risk, while operative grading systems such as the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) remains largely confined to research settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) may provide practical solutions. We evaluated a previously validated AI-derived surgical video assessment of disease severity for predicting perioperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive surgical videos (6/2022-1/2024) routinely analyzed by the AI platform. AI-derived severity scores were stratified into Low (uncomplicated) and High (complicated) groups. Multivariable analysis identified independent predictors of complications. Operative-AAST served for benchmarking. Model discrimination (AUC), post hoc recalibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 632 cases, 74.5% were low severity and 25.5% high. The High group had higher complication rates (26.7% vs. 10%; p<0.001), including intraoperative (11.8 vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (15.5 vs. 7.5%; p = 0.005). AI-derived severity independently predicted complications (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.62-4.73; p < 0.001), even after adjustment for operative-AAST (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.36; p = 0.028). Discrimination was modest (AUC = 0.63), similar to operative-AAST (AUC = 0.68). Calibration plot showed incremental increase in complication rates across probabilities, with acceptable agreements at extremes and improved alignment at intermediate-risk. DCA showed the model had highest net benefit at intermediate-risk, comparable or higher than operative-AAST. CONCLUSIONS: Automated AI-based surgical video assessment shows promise as a complementary tool for risk-prediction of laparoscopic appendectomy. It offers scalable risk stratification that may be implemented in routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, further study and model refinement are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13302-6
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI-based disease severity grading predicts complications in laparoscopic appendectomy

Monica Ortenzi, Danit Dayan, Tal Kardish, Eran Nizri
Surgical Endoscopy
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

AI-based disease severity grading predicts complications in laparoscopic appendectomy

Monica Ortenzi, Danit Dayan, Tal Kardish, Eran Nizri
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis severity underpins contemporary management guidelines, where laparoscopic appendectomy remains gold standard. Preoperative measures poorly predict actual disease severity or complication risk, while operative grading systems such as the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) remains largely confined to research settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) may provide practical solutions. We evaluated a previously validated AI-derived surgical video assessment of disease severity for predicting perioperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive surgical videos (6/2022-1/2024) routinely analyzed by the AI platform. AI-derived severity scores were stratified into Low (uncomplicated) and High (complicated) groups. Multivariable analysis identified independent predictors of complications. Operative-AAST served for benchmarking. Model discrimination (AUC), post hoc recalibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 632 cases, 74.5% were low severity and 25.5% high. The High group had higher complication rates (26.7% vs. 10%; p<0.001), including intraoperative (11.8 vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (15.5 vs. 7.5%; p = 0.005). AI-derived severity independently predicted complications (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.62-4.73; p < 0.001), even after adjustment for operative-AAST (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.36; p = 0.028). Discrimination was modest (AUC = 0.63), similar to operative-AAST (AUC = 0.68). Calibration plot showed incremental increase in complication rates across probabilities, with acceptable agreements at extremes and improved alignment at intermediate-risk. DCA showed the model had highest net benefit at intermediate-risk, comparable or higher than operative-AAST. CONCLUSIONS: Automated AI-based surgical video assessment shows promise as a complementary tool for risk-prediction of laparoscopic appendectomy. It offers scalable risk stratification that may be implemented in routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, further study and model refinement are warranted.

Surgical Endoscopy
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Tel Aviv University (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Tel Aviv University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.