Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive blood disorder that impacts about 100,000 Americans. With increasing life expectancy and more people with SCD reaching reproductive age, there is growing evidence that SCD and some of its therapies decrease fertility. While partner testing and assisted reproductive technology (ART) can enable people with SCD to choose if and how to have biological children, their use remains limited. In this study, we aimed to explore how people with SCD understand the potential fertility implications of SCD and their perceptions of partner testing and ART. METHODS: We recruited adults with SCD ages 18-35 years old who self-identified as being interested in having a biological child in the future and conducted semi-structured individual interviews to discuss previous experiences and perceptions regarding family building planning. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using inductive coding and the social ecological model. RESULTS: We completed 11 interviews with 9 women and 2 men (mean age 30.6 years old, 100% Black or African American). We identified five themes that reached saturation: 1) Providers gave limited support for family building planning; 2) Female participants had a lack of understanding what pregnancy would be like with SCD; 3) Participants felt their partners did not equally share the burden of family building planning; 4) Potential financial burden prevented participants from seriously considering ART; and 5) Participants wanted earlier and frequent discussions with their providers about family building options. Participants identified factors that impacted their family building plans, which fit across the social ecological model. DISCUSSION: Adults with SCD desire further education on the impact of SCD and its treatments on fertility as well as support in their reproductive planning through early, frequent conversations about family building options. Additionally, financial barriers to ART such as insurance coverage must be addressed for adults with SCD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355020
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease

Robert Michael Cronin, Leena Nahata, Susan E. Creary, Rachel D’Amico Gordon et al.
PLoS ONE
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease

Robert Michael Cronin, Leena Nahata, Susan E. Creary, Rachel D’Amico Gordon, Nives Quaye, Kayla Dyson
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive blood disorder that impacts about 100,000 Americans. With increasing life expectancy and more people with SCD reaching reproductive age, there is growing evidence that SCD and some of its therapies decrease fertility. While partner testing and assisted reproductive technology (ART) can enable people with SCD to choose if and how to have biological children, their use remains limited. In this study, we aimed to explore how people with SCD understand the potential fertility implications of SCD and their perceptions of partner testing and ART. METHODS: We recruited adults with SCD ages 18-35 years old who self-identified as being interested in having a biological child in the future and conducted semi-structured individual interviews to discuss previous experiences and perceptions regarding family building planning. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using inductive coding and the social ecological model. RESULTS: We completed 11 interviews with 9 women and 2 men (mean age 30.6 years old, 100% Black or African American). We identified five themes that reached saturation: 1) Providers gave limited support for family building planning; 2) Female participants had a lack of understanding what pregnancy would be like with SCD; 3) Participants felt their partners did not equally share the burden of family building planning; 4) Potential financial burden prevented participants from seriously considering ART; and 5) Participants wanted earlier and frequent discussions with their providers about family building options. Participants identified factors that impacted their family building plans, which fit across the social ecological model. DISCUSSION: Adults with SCD desire further education on the impact of SCD and its treatments on fertility as well as support in their reproductive planning through early, frequent conversations about family building options. Additionally, financial barriers to ART such as insurance coverage must be addressed for adults with SCD.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.