Real-world overall survival improvements in metastatic urothelial carcinoma across three key therapeutic temporal periods

BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has been transformed by three backbone therapies: platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), used alone or in combination. Evaluating temporal trends in overall survival (OS) is essential to contextualize therapeutic progress and identify unmet needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the TriNetX research database, we conducted a retrospective, large-scale outcome analysis of patients with mUC who received at least one line of therapy across international health care institutions. Patients were stratified into three therapeutic temporal periods (TPs): PBC TP (1999-2015), ICI TP (2016-2018), and ADC TP (2019-2025). Baseline characteristics were compared using standard statistical methods. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for age, sex, stage, comorbidities, and treatment lines. RESULTS: Among 4720 patients with mUC, 2383 who received first-line therapy between 1999 and 2025 were included (783 PBC TP, 663 ICI TP, and 937 ADC TP). Median age was ∼70 years across periods, and baseline characteristics were balanced (all P > 0.05). Across TPs, 51.7%, 32%, and 20% of patients received PBC, ICIs, and ADCs, respectively. Receipt of second- and third-line therapy remained stable (∼52% and ∼26%, respectively). Median OS increased from 13.5 months in the PBC TP to 17.5 months in the ICI TP and 21.1 months in the ADC TP (ADC versus PBC P = 0.0017). After PSM, median OS was 13.4, 17.3, and 22.3 months in the PBC, ICI, and ADC TPs, respectively (ADC versus PBC P = 0.005). Among patients receiving chemotherapy only in their respective PBC, ICI, and ADC TPs, OS was 13.5, 14.6, and 17.1 months (PBC versus ADC P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: OS in mUC has improved substantially over time, with the greatest gains observed in the ADC TP. Improvements were evident even among patients not receiving TP-specific agents, suggesting that broader advances in diagnostics, supportive care, and health care delivery contributed to real-world survival gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108363
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world overall survival improvements in metastatic urothelial carcinoma across three key therapeutic temporal periods

Alessandro Bertini, Valentina Tateo, Petros D. Grivas, Antonio Cigliola et al.
ESMO Open
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Real-world overall survival improvements in metastatic urothelial carcinoma across three key therapeutic temporal periods

Alessandro Bertini, Valentina Tateo, Petros D. Grivas, Antonio Cigliola, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Nazlı Dizman, Neeraj Agarwal, M. Piacentini, P.E. Spiess, S.K. Pal, A. Briganti, F. Montorsi, S. Gupta, G. Guandalini, A. Kamat, A. Necchi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has been transformed by three backbone therapies: platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), used alone or in combination. Evaluating temporal trends in overall survival (OS) is essential to contextualize therapeutic progress and identify unmet needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the TriNetX research database, we conducted a retrospective, large-scale outcome analysis of patients with mUC who received at least one line of therapy across international health care institutions. Patients were stratified into three therapeutic temporal periods (TPs): PBC TP (1999-2015), ICI TP (2016-2018), and ADC TP (2019-2025). Baseline characteristics were compared using standard statistical methods. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for age, sex, stage, comorbidities, and treatment lines. RESULTS: Among 4720 patients with mUC, 2383 who received first-line therapy between 1999 and 2025 were included (783 PBC TP, 663 ICI TP, and 937 ADC TP). Median age was ∼70 years across periods, and baseline characteristics were balanced (all P > 0.05). Across TPs, 51.7%, 32%, and 20% of patients received PBC, ICIs, and ADCs, respectively. Receipt of second- and third-line therapy remained stable (∼52% and ∼26%, respectively). Median OS increased from 13.5 months in the PBC TP to 17.5 months in the ICI TP and 21.1 months in the ADC TP (ADC versus PBC P = 0.0017). After PSM, median OS was 13.4, 17.3, and 22.3 months in the PBC, ICI, and ADC TPs, respectively (ADC versus PBC P = 0.005). Among patients receiving chemotherapy only in their respective PBC, ICI, and ADC TPs, OS was 13.5, 14.6, and 17.1 months (PBC versus ADC P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: OS in mUC has improved substantially over time, with the greatest gains observed in the ADC TP. Improvements were evident even among patients not receiving TP-specific agents, suggesting that broader advances in diagnostics, supportive care, and health care delivery contributed to real-world survival gains.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(9)
Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), University of Washington Medical Center (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), City of Hope (US), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), Seattle University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.