Camera–GPS Sensor Fusion for Kinematic Characterization, Microsimulation Validation, and Macroscopic Capacity Modeling of Traffic-Calming Corridors

This study presents a sensor-fused field investigation and simulation-based analysis of four horizontal and vertical traffic-calming devices—two raised speed tables, a speed hump, and a raised crosswalk—installed along a 5250-ft two-lane residential collector in Nashville, TN, USA. A dual-sensor architecture combining a Miovision Scout video-based vehicle counter and WAAS/EGNOS-augmented GPS probe-vehicle logging (5 m 3-D RMS horizontal accuracy, 1 Hz sampling) was used to reconstruct 30 quality-controlled free-flow vehicle trajectories and 12-h per-lane volume counts. A spatial kinematic transform (a = v·dv/dx) was applied to extract device-specific approach-deceleration and post-device recovery-acceleration rates, and a three-parameter log-logistic cumulative-distribution function was fitted to the field-observed desired-speed percentiles (root-mean-square error below 0.043 for both speed-table devices). The camera- and GPS-derived observations were used to calibrate and statistically validate a PTV VISSIM microsimulation replica of the corridor, achieving a mean-speed calibration error of 0.71% or better at every device, a GEH statistic below 1.5 at all four analysis turning movements, and independent travel-time validation errors of 5.7–12.1%, within the accepted 15% threshold. The validated model was then used to reconstruct device- and spacing-specific May–Keller macroscopic speed–density–flow relationships, calibrated against simulated capacities of 650–775 vehicles per hour per lane at 350-, 700-, and 1050-ft device spacing. Results show capacity reductions of 20–33% relative to free-flow conditions and yield kinematically derived maximum recommended spacings of 265–630 ft to maintain crossing speeds at or below 15 mph, depending on device geometry. The findings demonstrate a reproducible, low-cost sensor-fusion workflow for quantifying the safety–capacity trade-off of traffic-calming corridors and for informing the design of sensor-in-the-loop adaptive-calming infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175340
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camera–GPS Sensor Fusion for Kinematic Characterization, Microsimulation Validation, and Macroscopic Capacity Modeling of Traffic-Calming Corridors

Deo Chimba, Afia Serwaa Yeboah, Wittness Mariki, Sunam Shrestha
Sensors
Traffic control and management
article

Camera–GPS Sensor Fusion for Kinematic Characterization, Microsimulation Validation, and Macroscopic Capacity Modeling of Traffic-Calming Corridors

Deo Chimba, Afia Serwaa Yeboah, Wittness Mariki, Sunam Shrestha
article en

Abstract

This study presents a sensor-fused field investigation and simulation-based analysis of four horizontal and vertical traffic-calming devices—two raised speed tables, a speed hump, and a raised crosswalk—installed along a 5250-ft two-lane residential collector in Nashville, TN, USA. A dual-sensor architecture combining a Miovision Scout video-based vehicle counter and WAAS/EGNOS-augmented GPS probe-vehicle logging (5 m 3-D RMS horizontal accuracy, 1 Hz sampling) was used to reconstruct 30 quality-controlled free-flow vehicle trajectories and 12-h per-lane volume counts. A spatial kinematic transform (a = v·dv/dx) was applied to extract device-specific approach-deceleration and post-device recovery-acceleration rates, and a three-parameter log-logistic cumulative-distribution function was fitted to the field-observed desired-speed percentiles (root-mean-square error below 0.043 for both speed-table devices). The camera- and GPS-derived observations were used to calibrate and statistically validate a PTV VISSIM microsimulation replica of the corridor, achieving a mean-speed calibration error of 0.71% or better at every device, a GEH statistic below 1.5 at all four analysis turning movements, and independent travel-time validation errors of 5.7–12.1%, within the accepted 15% threshold. The validated model was then used to reconstruct device- and spacing-specific May–Keller macroscopic speed–density–flow relationships, calibrated against simulated capacities of 650–775 vehicles per hour per lane at 350-, 700-, and 1050-ft device spacing. Results show capacity reductions of 20–33% relative to free-flow conditions and yield kinematically derived maximum recommended spacings of 265–630 ft to maintain crossing speeds at or below 15 mph, depending on device geometry. The findings demonstrate a reproducible, low-cost sensor-fusion workflow for quantifying the safety–capacity trade-off of traffic-calming corridors and for informing the design of sensor-in-the-loop adaptive-calming infrastructure.

SensorsVol. 26(17)
Tennessee State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.