Quantum Error Correction: No Golden Ratio in Stabilizer Code Parameters — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: Quantum error correction (QEC) codes are parameterized by (n, k, d) — physical qubits, logical qubits, minimum distance — with stabilizer/CSS structure; no explicit golden ratio appears in the search results. | MATH: QEC code rate R = k/n; distance d determines error correction capability t = ⌊(d−1)/2⌋; CSS codes from classical linear codes C₁ ⊂ C₂ with parameters [n, k₁−k₂, d ≥ min(d₁, d₂)]. Shor code: [[9,1,3]]. | CONNECTION: The stabilizer formalism is a finite abelian group over GF(2)²ⁿ — a symplectic vector space. This is a lattice/root-system structure (e.g., E₈ lattice appears in [[8,0,2]] and [[8,1,2]] codes). The ratio d/n for optimal codes often approaches quantum Hamming bound; no 0.618/1.618 ratio is evidenced. | DEPTH: 4 — foundational but no harmonic ratio extracted; the search results are pedagogical, not novel mathematical discoveries. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22075618
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Quantum Error Correction: No Golden Ratio in Stabilizer Code Parameters — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
preprint

Quantum Error Correction: No Golden Ratio in Stabilizer Code Parameters — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: Quantum error correction (QEC) codes are parameterized by (n, k, d) — physical qubits, logical qubits, minimum distance — with stabilizer/CSS structure; no explicit golden ratio appears in the search results. | MATH: QEC code rate R = k/n; distance d determines error correction capability t = ⌊(d−1)/2⌋; CSS codes from classical linear codes C₁ ⊂ C₂ with parameters [n, k₁−k₂, d ≥ min(d₁, d₂)]. Shor code: [[9,1,3]]. | CONNECTION: The stabilizer formalism is a finite abelian group over GF(2)²ⁿ — a symplectic vector space. This is a lattice/root-system structure (e.g., E₈ lattice appears in [[8,0,2]] and [[8,1,2]] codes). The ratio d/n for optimal codes often approaches quantum Hamming bound; no 0.618/1.618 ratio is evidenced. | DEPTH: 4 — foundational but no harmonic ratio extracted; the search results are pedagogical, not novel mathematical discoveries. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.