Why sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy can be ethically acceptable: a reproductive bioethical perspective

We examine the ethical permissibility of sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy and assess whether such arrangements, often prohibited in many jurisdictions, can be ethically justified and beneficial when properly regulated. I employ normative ethical analysis grounded in the four core bioethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. I find that, with appropriate safeguards such as independent counseling, legal clarity, and ongoing psychological support, sister-based gestational surrogacy can enhance informed consent, reduce psychological risks, and strengthen familial bonds. Altruistic surrogacy arrangements- those without financial compensation- further mitigate the risks of exploitation and commodification. Emotional trust and solidarity between sisters can support relational autonomy and ethical surrogacy practices. I conclude that sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy embedded within robust ethical and legal frameworks can be a morally permissible and even desirable reproductive option. The article challenges blanket prohibitions and advocates for nuanced, regulated pathways that uphold the dignity and well-being of both surrogate and intended mother.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Behavior
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2026.2721656
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Why sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy can be ethically acceptable: a reproductive bioethical perspective

Ya’arit Bokek‐Cohen
Ethics & Behavior
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Why sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy can be ethically acceptable: a reproductive bioethical perspective

Ya’arit Bokek‐Cohen
article en

Abstract

We examine the ethical permissibility of sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy and assess whether such arrangements, often prohibited in many jurisdictions, can be ethically justified and beneficial when properly regulated. I employ normative ethical analysis grounded in the four core bioethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. I find that, with appropriate safeguards such as independent counseling, legal clarity, and ongoing psychological support, sister-based gestational surrogacy can enhance informed consent, reduce psychological risks, and strengthen familial bonds. Altruistic surrogacy arrangements- those without financial compensation- further mitigate the risks of exploitation and commodification. Emotional trust and solidarity between sisters can support relational autonomy and ethical surrogacy practices. I conclude that sister-to-sister gestational surrogacy embedded within robust ethical and legal frameworks can be a morally permissible and even desirable reproductive option. The article challenges blanket prohibitions and advocates for nuanced, regulated pathways that uphold the dignity and well-being of both surrogate and intended mother.

Ethics & Behavior
Netanya Academic College (IL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.