Depression or Anxiety by Region, Small-Area Deprivation, and Health Care Level in Sweden

Importance: There is a lack of comprehensive evidence on the burden and management of depression or anxiety in health care systems that leverage multiple health care and prescription registers, including primary care datasets in which these conditions typically first present. Objective: To examine the distribution of depression or anxiety among people 10 years or older in Sweden by region, small-area deprivation, and health care level of first diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, register-based, cross-sectional study included people aged 10 years or older who were living in Sweden from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Data were analyzed from January to June 2026. Exposure: Small-area deprivation was defined for 5984 small geographic areas in 2015 using a published Index for Multiple Deprivation in Sweden categorized into quartiles. Main outcomes and measures: Depression or anxiety was defined as the first diagnosis, or first prescription date if no diagnosis was recorded in the study period. Crude and age-standardized rates of depression or anxiety per 1000 persons were tabulated at national and subnational levels. Multilevel logistic regression quantified associations between small-area deprivation and the outcome adjusted for confounders. Health care level for the first diagnosis was compared by region, small-area deprivation, and patient characteristics. Results: Among 8 528 198 individuals aged 10 years or older (50.2% female), 2 087 413 had recorded depression or anxiety between 2015 and 2023, corresponding to a rate of 244.8 (95% CI, 244.4-245.1) cases per 1000 persons. Higher odds of depression or anxiety were found in the most vs least deprived areas (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.20). Among 1 359 196 patients with depression and anxiety between 2015 and 2017, 56.2% (95% CI, 56.1%-56.3%), 18.1% (95% CI, 18.0%-18.1%), and 3.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-3.2%) were first diagnosed in primary, outpatient, and inpatient care, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study using administrative registers found lower rates of depression or anxiety among residents of Sweden than reported in population surveys, likely due to underestimating individuals not seeking health care. Higher odds of depression or anxiety in most vs least deprived areas could underscore the association of these conditions with socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts. Variation by region and patient characteristics in the health care level for first diagnosis merits further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.30530
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Depression or Anxiety by Region, Small-Area Deprivation, and Health Care Level in Sweden

Emily White Johansson, Susanne Wicks, Anna Ohlis, Christina Dalman et al.
JAMA Network Open
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Depression or Anxiety by Region, Small-Area Deprivation, and Health Care Level in Sweden

Emily White Johansson, Susanne Wicks, Anna Ohlis, Christina Dalman, Ahmed Nabil Shaaban, Lode van der Velde, Mathias Mattsson, Emilie E. Agardh
article en

Abstract

Importance: There is a lack of comprehensive evidence on the burden and management of depression or anxiety in health care systems that leverage multiple health care and prescription registers, including primary care datasets in which these conditions typically first present. Objective: To examine the distribution of depression or anxiety among people 10 years or older in Sweden by region, small-area deprivation, and health care level of first diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, register-based, cross-sectional study included people aged 10 years or older who were living in Sweden from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Data were analyzed from January to June 2026. Exposure: Small-area deprivation was defined for 5984 small geographic areas in 2015 using a published Index for Multiple Deprivation in Sweden categorized into quartiles. Main outcomes and measures: Depression or anxiety was defined as the first diagnosis, or first prescription date if no diagnosis was recorded in the study period. Crude and age-standardized rates of depression or anxiety per 1000 persons were tabulated at national and subnational levels. Multilevel logistic regression quantified associations between small-area deprivation and the outcome adjusted for confounders. Health care level for the first diagnosis was compared by region, small-area deprivation, and patient characteristics. Results: Among 8 528 198 individuals aged 10 years or older (50.2% female), 2 087 413 had recorded depression or anxiety between 2015 and 2023, corresponding to a rate of 244.8 (95% CI, 244.4-245.1) cases per 1000 persons. Higher odds of depression or anxiety were found in the most vs least deprived areas (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.20). Among 1 359 196 patients with depression and anxiety between 2015 and 2017, 56.2% (95% CI, 56.1%-56.3%), 18.1% (95% CI, 18.0%-18.1%), and 3.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-3.2%) were first diagnosed in primary, outpatient, and inpatient care, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study using administrative registers found lower rates of depression or anxiety among residents of Sweden than reported in population surveys, likely due to underestimating individuals not seeking health care. Higher odds of depression or anxiety in most vs least deprived areas could underscore the association of these conditions with socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts. Variation by region and patient characteristics in the health care level for first diagnosis merits further investigation.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(8)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Centre for Palaeogenetics (SE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.