Maintaining equilibrium: toward a homeostatic theory of organizations

Purpose This paper aims to introduce the Organizational Homeostasis Model (OHM), a conceptual framework that explains how organizations maintain functional equilibrium under conditions of uncertainty, disruption and continuous strain. Drawing on principles of biological homeostasis, the study seeks to provide an integrative perspective on how organizations regulate stability, adaptation, recovery and dysfunction over time. Design/methodology/approach The paper adopts a conceptual and interdisciplinary approach, systematically translating core principles of biological homeostasis into organizational mechanisms. It integrates literature from biology, organizational behavior, resilience, stress and burnout research and systems theory to develop a model linking environmental pressures, regulatory systems, adjustment processes, equilibrium and dysregulation. Findings The framework proposes that organizational functioning depends on continuous regulatory processes that monitor strain, calibrate responses and restore equilibrium under changing conditions. The model identifies three central adjustment processes: monitoring, calibration and adjustment and recovery and recalibration. It further conceptualizes dysfunctions such as burnout, rigidity, fragmentation and chronic crisis orientation as forms of homeostatic dysregulation emerging from prolonged imbalance between environmental pressures and regulatory capacity. Originality/value This study contributes by developing the OHM, a biologically grounded framework that explains how organizations maintain equilibrium through continuous processes of monitoring, regulation, recovery and adaptive recalibration. By integrating contemporary concepts of homeostasis and allostasis with organizational behavior and resilience research, the model offers a unified explanation of organizational stability and dysfunction. The OHM integrates structural and dynamic perspectives within a unified framework and offers a novel lens for examining resilience, organizational health, stress, recovery and long-term adaptive functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-05-2026-7070
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintaining equilibrium: toward a homeostatic theory of organizations

Yonatan Shertzer, Anat Nitzan
International journal of organizational analysis
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Maintaining equilibrium: toward a homeostatic theory of organizations

Yonatan Shertzer, Anat Nitzan
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to introduce the Organizational Homeostasis Model (OHM), a conceptual framework that explains how organizations maintain functional equilibrium under conditions of uncertainty, disruption and continuous strain. Drawing on principles of biological homeostasis, the study seeks to provide an integrative perspective on how organizations regulate stability, adaptation, recovery and dysfunction over time. Design/methodology/approach The paper adopts a conceptual and interdisciplinary approach, systematically translating core principles of biological homeostasis into organizational mechanisms. It integrates literature from biology, organizational behavior, resilience, stress and burnout research and systems theory to develop a model linking environmental pressures, regulatory systems, adjustment processes, equilibrium and dysregulation. Findings The framework proposes that organizational functioning depends on continuous regulatory processes that monitor strain, calibrate responses and restore equilibrium under changing conditions. The model identifies three central adjustment processes: monitoring, calibration and adjustment and recovery and recalibration. It further conceptualizes dysfunctions such as burnout, rigidity, fragmentation and chronic crisis orientation as forms of homeostatic dysregulation emerging from prolonged imbalance between environmental pressures and regulatory capacity. Originality/value This study contributes by developing the OHM, a biologically grounded framework that explains how organizations maintain equilibrium through continuous processes of monitoring, regulation, recovery and adaptive recalibration. By integrating contemporary concepts of homeostasis and allostasis with organizational behavior and resilience research, the model offers a unified explanation of organizational stability and dysfunction. The OHM integrates structural and dynamic perspectives within a unified framework and offers a novel lens for examining resilience, organizational health, stress, recovery and long-term adaptive functioning.

International journal of organizational analysis
Tel Aviv University (IL), Peres Academic Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.