Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators

This is a synthesis of the research area and issues involving sexual choking, followed by calls to action based on the synthesis. We describe the health risks associated with sexual choking, which is often performed as a form of strangulation, along with its growing popularity in at least the Australia, Iceland, Italy, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States. Beginning with a clarification of the often-obfuscated terminology, this paper describes various ways that people are exposed to the practice of sexual choking. Our team identified social media, online pornography, and other popular media as potential drivers of the higher numbers of people reporting engaging in sexual choking compared to older studies. However, there are significant problems with consent and legal issues, including cases where consensual adult choking involving injury or death have resulted in criminal or civil charges in the U.S. This group of researchers, educators, and health experts offers calls to action in specific steps: (1) Widespread education about sexual choking and its risks; (2) Empowering critical evaluation through media and pornography literacy; (3) Organizational engagement in increasing risk awareness; (4) Health education curriculum development; (5) Healthcare provider continuing education; (6) Funding research that addresses sexual choking topics. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the research on this concerning trend in a manner accessible to a diverse array of audiences, and to offer calls to action to address this public health issue for researchers, educators, clinicians, students, kink/BDSM community members, and mainstream persons alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-026-03481-7
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators

Susan Wright, Debby Herbenick, S. J. Ratcliff, Anna Randall et al.
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators

Susan Wright, Debby Herbenick, S. J. Ratcliff, Anna Randall, Doug D. Brown, Russell Stambaugh, Gael Strack, Tess Zachary, Aidan A. Sunassee, K. Tony Korol-Evans, Kiana Cummings
article en

Abstract

This is a synthesis of the research area and issues involving sexual choking, followed by calls to action based on the synthesis. We describe the health risks associated with sexual choking, which is often performed as a form of strangulation, along with its growing popularity in at least the Australia, Iceland, Italy, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States. Beginning with a clarification of the often-obfuscated terminology, this paper describes various ways that people are exposed to the practice of sexual choking. Our team identified social media, online pornography, and other popular media as potential drivers of the higher numbers of people reporting engaging in sexual choking compared to older studies. However, there are significant problems with consent and legal issues, including cases where consensual adult choking involving injury or death have resulted in criminal or civil charges in the U.S. This group of researchers, educators, and health experts offers calls to action in specific steps: (1) Widespread education about sexual choking and its risks; (2) Empowering critical evaluation through media and pornography literacy; (3) Organizational engagement in increasing risk awareness; (4) Health education curriculum development; (5) Healthcare provider continuing education; (6) Funding research that addresses sexual choking topics. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the research on this concerning trend in a manner accessible to a diverse array of audiences, and to offer calls to action to address this public health issue for researchers, educators, clinicians, students, kink/BDSM community members, and mainstream persons alike.

Archives of Sexual Behavior
University of Southern California (US), Oregon Research Institute (US), University of Wisconsin–Stout (US), Southeastern Louisiana University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Ohio Domestic Violence Network (US), Strang Cancer Prevention Institute (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), China National Administration of Coal Geology (CN), Health Research Alliance (US), University of Applied Sciences Europe (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.