Oncologic Outcomes in a Contemporary “PROTEUS-like” Cohort of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy

Background and objective High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) carries substantial risks of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains investigational. The PROTEUS (NCT03767244) trial evaluates perioperative apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but lacks a surgery-only control cohort. The objective of this study is to characterize oncologic outcomes in patients with PROTEUS-like high-risk PCa undergoing RP without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients fulfilling PROTEUS high-risk criteria who underwent RP with lymphadenectomy without prior ADT or neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence–free survival (BCR-FS). Secondary outcomes included metastasis-free survival (MFS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Key findings and limitations Among 1392 patients, median follow-up was 60 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–64); 67% received postoperative radiotherapy. BCR-FS at 36, 60, and 120 mo was 60% (95% CI, 57–64), 44% (95% CI, 40–49), and 22% (95% CI, 17–28), respectively. MFS was 79% (95% CI, 76–83), 71% (95% CI, 66–76), and 56% (95% CI, 47–65), respectively. EFS was 56% (95% CI, 52–60), 40% (95% CI, 36–45), and 18% (95% CI, 13–23), respectively. CSS remained high at 95.5% (95% CI, 94–97), 92% (95% CI, 90–94), and 86% (95% CI, 81–91), respectively. Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, absence of centralized pathology review, and maturing follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications These findings demonstrate substantial rates of recurrence and metastatic progression despite contemporary management, underscoring the persistent unmet need in this population and providing a rationale for prospective evaluation of perioperative treatment intensification strategies such as PROTEUS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Open Science
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.08.001
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncologic Outcomes in a Contemporary “PROTEUS-like” Cohort of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy

J. Steinestel, Can Aydogdu, Frederik Kolligs, Roman Mayr et al.
European Urology Open Science
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Oncologic Outcomes in a Contemporary “PROTEUS-like” Cohort of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy

J. Steinestel, Can Aydogdu, Frederik Kolligs, Roman Mayr, Elena K Berg, Alexander Büchner, Iason Papadopoulos, Thilo Westhofen, Matthias Heck, Benso John, Christian G. Stief, Clara Seizer, Jozefina Casuscelli
article en

Abstract

Background and objective High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) carries substantial risks of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains investigational. The PROTEUS (NCT03767244) trial evaluates perioperative apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but lacks a surgery-only control cohort. The objective of this study is to characterize oncologic outcomes in patients with PROTEUS-like high-risk PCa undergoing RP without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients fulfilling PROTEUS high-risk criteria who underwent RP with lymphadenectomy without prior ADT or neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence–free survival (BCR-FS). Secondary outcomes included metastasis-free survival (MFS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Key findings and limitations Among 1392 patients, median follow-up was 60 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–64); 67% received postoperative radiotherapy. BCR-FS at 36, 60, and 120 mo was 60% (95% CI, 57–64), 44% (95% CI, 40–49), and 22% (95% CI, 17–28), respectively. MFS was 79% (95% CI, 76–83), 71% (95% CI, 66–76), and 56% (95% CI, 47–65), respectively. EFS was 56% (95% CI, 52–60), 40% (95% CI, 36–45), and 18% (95% CI, 13–23), respectively. CSS remained high at 95.5% (95% CI, 94–97), 92% (95% CI, 90–94), and 86% (95% CI, 81–91), respectively. Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, absence of centralized pathology review, and maturing follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications These findings demonstrate substantial rates of recurrence and metastatic progression despite contemporary management, underscoring the persistent unmet need in this population and providing a rationale for prospective evaluation of perioperative treatment intensification strategies such as PROTEUS.

European Urology Open ScienceVol. 92
University of Augsburg (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.