Beyond anomie: The social and political consciousness of marginalized people

The political capacity of marginalized people to act has long been a recurring topic in political and public discourse. While a substantial body of scholarship has documented everyday forms of resistance, informal solidarity, and collective organization among marginalized groups, public debates and parts of the academic literature continue to portray them as politically disengaged, or incapable of collective action. This article contributes to that debate by examining how marginalized people themselves understand their social and political situation. Drawing on interviews with marginalized people in Germany, I show that their consciousness is divided among three forms – social, individual, and political – from which no singular pattern of political capacity can be inferred. Rather than revealing either political passivity or agency, the findings point to a diverse range of orientations, including resignation, individual coping strategies, informal solidarity, and political engagement. The article argues that understanding how these forms of consciousness coexist and interact provides a more nuanced account of the possibilities of politicization among marginalized groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261473315
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond anomie: The social and political consciousness of marginalized people

Christopher Wimmer
Critical Sociology
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Beyond anomie: The social and political consciousness of marginalized people

Christopher Wimmer
article en

Abstract

The political capacity of marginalized people to act has long been a recurring topic in political and public discourse. While a substantial body of scholarship has documented everyday forms of resistance, informal solidarity, and collective organization among marginalized groups, public debates and parts of the academic literature continue to portray them as politically disengaged, or incapable of collective action. This article contributes to that debate by examining how marginalized people themselves understand their social and political situation. Drawing on interviews with marginalized people in Germany, I show that their consciousness is divided among three forms – social, individual, and political – from which no singular pattern of political capacity can be inferred. Rather than revealing either political passivity or agency, the findings point to a diverse range of orientations, including resignation, individual coping strategies, informal solidarity, and political engagement. The article argues that understanding how these forms of consciousness coexist and interact provides a more nuanced account of the possibilities of politicization among marginalized groups.

Critical Sociology
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.