‘No, it is a virus, your body will fight it.’ The value of diagnostic testing for managing respiratory viruses in primary care: an observational study from a post-COVID pilot programme

INTRODUCTION: International studies suggest that advancing diagnostic technologies have the potential to reduce uncertainty and improve management of acute respiratory infections. AIM: This study aimed to observe the impact that laboratory-based polymerase chain reaction testing for respiratory viruses, alongside a COVID-19 rapid antigen test, had on patient management during a pandemic. Observations may enhance knowledge about the utility of respiratory virus testing in primary care. METHOD: The electronic medical records of patients tested at one urban general practice in New Zealand were examined 90 days before and after respiratory virus testing to record and analyse data on test results, patient characteristics, antibiotic prescribing, presentations, and follow-up communications. RESULTS: Among 298 presentations reviewed, 53% tested positive via polymerase chain reaction test. Antibiotics were prescribed for 37% of all presentations. Patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus were more likely to receive an antibiotic prescription than those who tested negative, both before and after test results. Notes showed texts and emails being used effectively to convey test results although some lacked evidence of test result communication. No impact on presentation patterns was identified. DISCUSSION: Test results were used for effective follow-up with some patients, but there were also gaps in communication of results and variation in prescribing patterns following receipt of test results. Test-based limitations as well as broader environmental, clinical, and psychological factors are hypothesised as influencing test use. Advancing point-of-care technologies which offer faster result availability may address some, but not all of these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/hc26003
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘No, it is a virus, your body will fight it.’ The value of diagnostic testing for managing respiratory viruses in primary care: an observational study from a post-COVID pilot programme

Anthony Dowell, Lorraine Castelino, Sue Huang, Isabella Cheung et al.
Journal of Primary Health Care
Respiratory viral infections research
article

‘No, it is a virus, your body will fight it.’ The value of diagnostic testing for managing respiratory viruses in primary care: an observational study from a post-COVID pilot programme

Anthony Dowell, Lorraine Castelino, Sue Huang, Isabella Cheung, Nikki Turner, Christine McIntosh, Michelle Balm, Lizzie Wesley-Smith
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: International studies suggest that advancing diagnostic technologies have the potential to reduce uncertainty and improve management of acute respiratory infections. AIM: This study aimed to observe the impact that laboratory-based polymerase chain reaction testing for respiratory viruses, alongside a COVID-19 rapid antigen test, had on patient management during a pandemic. Observations may enhance knowledge about the utility of respiratory virus testing in primary care. METHOD: The electronic medical records of patients tested at one urban general practice in New Zealand were examined 90 days before and after respiratory virus testing to record and analyse data on test results, patient characteristics, antibiotic prescribing, presentations, and follow-up communications. RESULTS: Among 298 presentations reviewed, 53% tested positive via polymerase chain reaction test. Antibiotics were prescribed for 37% of all presentations. Patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus were more likely to receive an antibiotic prescription than those who tested negative, both before and after test results. Notes showed texts and emails being used effectively to convey test results although some lacked evidence of test result communication. No impact on presentation patterns was identified. DISCUSSION: Test results were used for effective follow-up with some patients, but there were also gaps in communication of results and variation in prescribing patterns following receipt of test results. Test-based limitations as well as broader environmental, clinical, and psychological factors are hypothesised as influencing test use. Advancing point-of-care technologies which offer faster result availability may address some, but not all of these issues.

Journal of Primary Health Care
University of Auckland (NZ), Advisory Board Company (United States) (US), Microbiology Society (GB), Genesis Laboratories (US), Hutt Hospital (NZ), Biology of Infection (FR), Instituto de Urologia e Nefrologia (BR), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology (CZ), Youth Development (US), Primary Health Care (QA), Institute of Forensic Science (CN), Institute of Molecular Medicine (IN), University of Otago (NZ), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (FR)
Flu Lab
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.