Stand Age Reshapes Belowground–Aboveground Coordination and Forage Production in Cultivated Leymus chinensis Grasslands
Cultivated grasslands provide an important strategy for reducing pressure on degraded natural grasslands and increasing high-quality forage supply. However, how stand-age-related variation affects belowground–aboveground coordination and forage production in cultivated Leymus chinensis remains unclear. Here, we compared a natural L. chinensis stand (NL) with 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old cultivated ‘Zhongke No. 1’ stands by integrating plant trait measurements, biomass assessment, nutrient analysis, forage quality evaluation, correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling. (1) Compared with NL, cultivated stands generally showed greater vegetative growth and aboveground biomass, lower fiber concentrations, and higher soluble sugar concentration and relative feed value. (2) Root and aboveground traits exhibited distinct stand-age-related patterns, with the 3Y stand showing greater root exploration traits, the 4Y stand achieving the highest aboveground biomass (4.61 t/hm2), and the 5Y stand exhibiting greater root thickening and ramet density. (3) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations varied among stand ages, indicating shifts in nutrient status during stand development. (4) Correlation analysis and PLS-SEM revealed that root architecture, nutrient status, and aboveground morphology were closely associated with forage yield and quality variation. These findings highlight the importance of stand-age-dependent belowground–aboveground coordination for optimizing the management and utilization of cultivated L. chinensis grasslands.
Authors
- Jiale Na
- Hai-Shuang Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7281-8456)
- Qi Luo
- Kai Gao
- Jian Zhang
- Tao Li
- Sitong Qu
- Zhaoxu Nie
- Ruozhuang Zhao
- Ruiying Ma
Institutions
- Hohhot Minzu College (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Agriculture
- Published
- 2026-08-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16171811
- Primary Topic
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00