Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Shear Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Titanium Abutment Surfaces

Background and Aim: This study evaluated the shearbond strength (SBS) of a universal resin cement to pre-milledtitanium surfaces using three different adhesive approaches.Materials and Methods: Forty-eight titanium specimens wereobtained from pre-milled titanium abutment blanks and equallydistributed into three experimental groups (n = 16) according tothe adhesive strategy: a dedicated metal primer (G-Multi Primer), atwo-bottle universal adhesive (Tokuyama Universal Bond II), and aone-bottle universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Plus). Prior tobonding, all surfaces were conditioned by airborne-particle abrasionusing 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Resin cement cylinders wereprepared using a custom stainless-steel jig to ensure standardizeddimensions and positioning. The same self-adhesive dual-cure resincement (Maxcem Elite) was used for all specimens. Following 24hours of water storage at 37°C, immediate SBS was measured usinga universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.Fracture patterns after debonding were categorized as adhesive,cohesive, or mixed failures. Statistical evaluation included one-wayANOVA and Fisher’s Exact test at a significance level of 0.05.Results: Baseline surface roughness did not differ significantlyamong the experimental groups (p > 0.05). Airborne-particleabrasion increased the mean Ra value from 0.22 μm to 0.54 μm,with no significant differences among the groups after surfacetreatment (p > 0.05). Tokuyama Universal Bond II demonstratedthe highest mean SBS value (18.53 ± 2.45 MPa), followed byG-Multi Primer (17.32 ± 1.99 MPa) and Scotchbond UniversalPlus (16.67 ± 1.97 MPa). There were no significant differencesamong the adhesive systems (p = 0.057). Adhesive-type failurerepresented the most frequent fracture pattern across all groups,accounting for 62.5%–75% of failures. Cohesive fractures wereidentified only in the Tokuyama and G-Multi Primer groups.Conclusions: Both universal adhesives and dedicatedmetal primers demonstrated comparable immediate bondingperformance to titanium surfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Dentistry and Research
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1954033
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Shear Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Titanium Abutment Surfaces

Mustafa Barış Güncü, İrem Sözen Yanık, Dilara Sahin Hazir
Clinical Dentistry and Research
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Shear Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Titanium Abutment Surfaces

Mustafa Barış Güncü, İrem Sözen Yanık, Dilara Sahin Hazir
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study evaluated the shearbond strength (SBS) of a universal resin cement to pre-milledtitanium surfaces using three different adhesive approaches.Materials and Methods: Forty-eight titanium specimens wereobtained from pre-milled titanium abutment blanks and equallydistributed into three experimental groups (n = 16) according tothe adhesive strategy: a dedicated metal primer (G-Multi Primer), atwo-bottle universal adhesive (Tokuyama Universal Bond II), and aone-bottle universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Plus). Prior tobonding, all surfaces were conditioned by airborne-particle abrasionusing 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Resin cement cylinders wereprepared using a custom stainless-steel jig to ensure standardizeddimensions and positioning. The same self-adhesive dual-cure resincement (Maxcem Elite) was used for all specimens. Following 24hours of water storage at 37°C, immediate SBS was measured usinga universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.Fracture patterns after debonding were categorized as adhesive,cohesive, or mixed failures. Statistical evaluation included one-wayANOVA and Fisher’s Exact test at a significance level of 0.05.Results: Baseline surface roughness did not differ significantlyamong the experimental groups (p > 0.05). Airborne-particleabrasion increased the mean Ra value from 0.22 μm to 0.54 μm,with no significant differences among the groups after surfacetreatment (p > 0.05). Tokuyama Universal Bond II demonstratedthe highest mean SBS value (18.53 ± 2.45 MPa), followed byG-Multi Primer (17.32 ± 1.99 MPa) and Scotchbond UniversalPlus (16.67 ± 1.97 MPa). There were no significant differencesamong the adhesive systems (p = 0.057). Adhesive-type failurerepresented the most frequent fracture pattern across all groups,accounting for 62.5%–75% of failures. Cohesive fractures wereidentified only in the Tokuyama and G-Multi Primer groups.Conclusions: Both universal adhesives and dedicatedmetal primers demonstrated comparable immediate bondingperformance to titanium surfaces.

Clinical Dentistry and ResearchVol. 50(2)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.