Labral Augmentation Decreases Humeral Head Displacement and Cartilage Stress in an Anterior Shoulder Instability Model With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis

Purpose To investigate the influence of labral augmentation on glenohumeral biomechanics for anterior glenohumeral instability patients via finite element analysis (FEA). Methods A shoulder finite element model was derived from preoperative computed tomography scans of five patients with anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5%‐25% of inferior glenoid width). Four models were established based on the affected shoulders, including a model of Bankart lesion combined with subcritical glenoid bone loss, a model of isolated Bankart repair, a model of Bankart repair plus remplissage, and a model of labral augmentation. The contralateral, unaffected shoulders served as normal controls. These five models were tested to assess humeral head displacement and stress on the joint capsule and cartilage. Results Labral augmentation outperformed Bankart repair with or without remplissage in restoring native joint characteristics. It limited humeral head displacement to control‐like levels (8.10 ± 0.58 vs 7.61 ± 0.46 mm, P = .18), normalized capsular stress (2.00 ± 0.20 vs 1.82 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .221), and reduced cartilage stress on the glenoid and humeral head to pre‐injury baselines (glenoid: 2.65 ± 0.18 vs 2.75 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .484; humeral head: 29.70 ± 1.92 vs 30.31 ± 1.93 MPa, P = .630). Conclusions In this FEA of anterior shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss, labral augmentation decreased humeral head displacement and restored articular cartilage stress to an intact state compared to Bankart repair with or without remplissage. Clinical Relevance This FEA study suggests labral augmentation in the context of subcritical bone loss may be a viable surgical treatment option for patients with shoulder instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70460
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labral Augmentation Decreases Humeral Head Displacement and Cartilage Stress in an Anterior Shoulder Instability Model With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis

Zhenglin Zhu, Xuelun Li, Dandong Wu, Bowen Li et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Labral Augmentation Decreases Humeral Head Displacement and Cartilage Stress in an Anterior Shoulder Instability Model With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis

Zhenglin Zhu, Xuelun Li, Dandong Wu, Bowen Li, Hong Chen, Jialin Feng, Bin Li, Wei Huang
article en

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the influence of labral augmentation on glenohumeral biomechanics for anterior glenohumeral instability patients via finite element analysis (FEA). Methods A shoulder finite element model was derived from preoperative computed tomography scans of five patients with anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5%‐25% of inferior glenoid width). Four models were established based on the affected shoulders, including a model of Bankart lesion combined with subcritical glenoid bone loss, a model of isolated Bankart repair, a model of Bankart repair plus remplissage, and a model of labral augmentation. The contralateral, unaffected shoulders served as normal controls. These five models were tested to assess humeral head displacement and stress on the joint capsule and cartilage. Results Labral augmentation outperformed Bankart repair with or without remplissage in restoring native joint characteristics. It limited humeral head displacement to control‐like levels (8.10 ± 0.58 vs 7.61 ± 0.46 mm, P = .18), normalized capsular stress (2.00 ± 0.20 vs 1.82 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .221), and reduced cartilage stress on the glenoid and humeral head to pre‐injury baselines (glenoid: 2.65 ± 0.18 vs 2.75 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .484; humeral head: 29.70 ± 1.92 vs 30.31 ± 1.93 MPa, P = .630). Conclusions In this FEA of anterior shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss, labral augmentation decreased humeral head displacement and restored articular cartilage stress to an intact state compared to Bankart repair with or without remplissage. Clinical Relevance This FEA study suggests labral augmentation in the context of subcritical bone loss may be a viable surgical treatment option for patients with shoulder instability.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Municipal Health Commission (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.