Exploring the Link: A Study on Consanguinity and Orofacial Clefts

Objective To evaluate the association between parental consanguinity and cleft phenotype, family history, syndromic status, regional distribution, and sex-specific presentation among Saudi patients affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Design Retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Setting Two tertiary referral centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients, Participants Included were 2137 patients diagnosed with cleft lip, cleft palate, or CL/P between 2014 and 2024. Patients with incomplete key variables or craniofacial anomalies unrelated to CL/P were excluded. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Cleft phenotype, parental consanguinity, family history of CL/P, syndromic status, regional distribution, and sex-specific cleft presentation. Results Among 2137 patients, 1291 (60.4%) were born to consanguineous parents. Cleft distribution did not differ significantly by consanguinity status. Consanguineous families had higher positive family history rates than nonconsanguineous families (40.7% vs 35.1%, P = .032), mainly due to affected extended relatives (30.1% vs 24.3%, P = .002). Bilateral CL/P was most frequent among consanguineous females (49.4%), while unilateral CL/P predominated among nonconsanguineous males (46.5%). Consanguineous cases were more frequent in Northern and Southern regions. Syndromic status was similar between groups (9.3% vs 10.4%, P = .399). Conclusions Among Saudi patients affected by CL/P, parental consanguinity was common and associated with a higher positive family history, especially among extended relatives. Bilateral CL/P was more frequent among consanguineous families, particularly females, while unilateral CL/P predominated among nonconsanguineous males. Syndromic status and cleft type by degree of consanguinity showed no significant association.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261477537
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Link: A Study on Consanguinity and Orofacial Clefts

Omar Suhaym, Ahmad Salem Assari, Nasser S. Alshahrani, Meshari Hamoud Alanazi et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Exploring the Link: A Study on Consanguinity and Orofacial Clefts

Omar Suhaym, Ahmad Salem Assari, Nasser S. Alshahrani, Meshari Hamoud Alanazi, Abdulaziz Alqarni
article en

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the association between parental consanguinity and cleft phenotype, family history, syndromic status, regional distribution, and sex-specific presentation among Saudi patients affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Design Retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Setting Two tertiary referral centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients, Participants Included were 2137 patients diagnosed with cleft lip, cleft palate, or CL/P between 2014 and 2024. Patients with incomplete key variables or craniofacial anomalies unrelated to CL/P were excluded. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Cleft phenotype, parental consanguinity, family history of CL/P, syndromic status, regional distribution, and sex-specific cleft presentation. Results Among 2137 patients, 1291 (60.4%) were born to consanguineous parents. Cleft distribution did not differ significantly by consanguinity status. Consanguineous families had higher positive family history rates than nonconsanguineous families (40.7% vs 35.1%, P = .032), mainly due to affected extended relatives (30.1% vs 24.3%, P = .002). Bilateral CL/P was most frequent among consanguineous females (49.4%), while unilateral CL/P predominated among nonconsanguineous males (46.5%). Consanguineous cases were more frequent in Northern and Southern regions. Syndromic status was similar between groups (9.3% vs 10.4%, P = .399). Conclusions Among Saudi patients affected by CL/P, parental consanguinity was common and associated with a higher positive family history, especially among extended relatives. Bilateral CL/P was more frequent among consanguineous families, particularly females, while unilateral CL/P predominated among nonconsanguineous males. Syndromic status and cleft type by degree of consanguinity showed no significant association.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.