Per Protocol Analysis and Long‐Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer Compared With Open Method

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic radical resection for gallbladder (GB) cancer has been attempted, only a limited number of studies have evaluated its outcomes using a per-protocol analytical approach. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2019, 213 patients underwent surgery for gallbladder (GB) cancer at three institutions, of whom 203 consecutive patients with T2 or T3 disease were retrospectively analyzed. Protocol-adherent radical resection (per-protocol) was defined as wedge liver resection or IVb/V bisegmentectomy with the procurement of at least four lymph nodes. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the laparoscopic and open approaches. RESULTS: Protocol-adherent radical resection was achieved in 14 of 76 patients (18.4%) in the laparoscopic group and in 76 of 127 patients (59.8%) in the open surgery group. The primary unmet criterion for radical resection was an insufficient lymph node yield (60/76, 78.9%) in the laparoscopic group. After 1:1 propensity score matching (54 pairs), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate did not differ between the laparoscopic and open approaches (46.1% vs. 49.9%; hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.47; p = 0.668), whereas the disparity in oncological adequacy persisted (protocol-adherent radical resection 20.4% vs. 70.4%). Among patients who achieved protocol-adherent radical resection (N = 90), the exploratory comparison of 5-year OS between the laparoscopic (N = 14) and open (N = 76) groups showed no significant difference (61.5% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.288). Multivariate analysis in patients with protocol-adherent radical resection identified N stage and elevated CA 19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether a laparoscopic or open approach is used, radical surgery-including appropriate hepatic resection with the retrieval of at least four lymph nodes-is essential for improving long-term prognosis in patients with GB cancer. N stage and elevated CA 19-9 levels were independently associated with overall survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70535
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Per Protocol Analysis and Long‐Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer Compared With Open Method

Tae Ho Hong, Jae Hyun Han, Kwang Yeol Paik, Dong Do You et al.
World Journal of Surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Per Protocol Analysis and Long‐Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer Compared With Open Method

Tae Ho Hong, Jae Hyun Han, Kwang Yeol Paik, Dong Do You, Jong Woo Lee, Yoon kyung Woo, Jung Woo Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic radical resection for gallbladder (GB) cancer has been attempted, only a limited number of studies have evaluated its outcomes using a per-protocol analytical approach. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2019, 213 patients underwent surgery for gallbladder (GB) cancer at three institutions, of whom 203 consecutive patients with T2 or T3 disease were retrospectively analyzed. Protocol-adherent radical resection (per-protocol) was defined as wedge liver resection or IVb/V bisegmentectomy with the procurement of at least four lymph nodes. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the laparoscopic and open approaches. RESULTS: Protocol-adherent radical resection was achieved in 14 of 76 patients (18.4%) in the laparoscopic group and in 76 of 127 patients (59.8%) in the open surgery group. The primary unmet criterion for radical resection was an insufficient lymph node yield (60/76, 78.9%) in the laparoscopic group. After 1:1 propensity score matching (54 pairs), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate did not differ between the laparoscopic and open approaches (46.1% vs. 49.9%; hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.47; p = 0.668), whereas the disparity in oncological adequacy persisted (protocol-adherent radical resection 20.4% vs. 70.4%). Among patients who achieved protocol-adherent radical resection (N = 90), the exploratory comparison of 5-year OS between the laparoscopic (N = 14) and open (N = 76) groups showed no significant difference (61.5% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.288). Multivariate analysis in patients with protocol-adherent radical resection identified N stage and elevated CA 19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether a laparoscopic or open approach is used, radical surgery-including appropriate hepatic resection with the retrieval of at least four lymph nodes-is essential for improving long-term prognosis in patients with GB cancer. N stage and elevated CA 19-9 levels were independently associated with overall survival.

World Journal of Surgery
Ulsan College (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.