How Everyday Microplastics Quietly Rewire Nickel Availability in Mediterranean Calcareous Soils

Microplastics are emerging as ubiquitous contaminants in agricultural soils, while nickel (Ni), although catalogued as a potentially toxic element, is an essential micronutrient and a cofactor of urease. In a pot experiment, this study examined how three microplastics (polyethylene, PE; poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET; and polystyrene, PS) affect nickel availability and the properties of two calcareous agricultural soils from central Greece. The microplastics were applied at two levels (1.5 and 3.0% by weight), and the samples were analysed at four time points (3, 6, 9, and 12 months, n = 3). Total (aqua regia) and available (DTPA) nickel, pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, bulk density (BD), water-holding capacity (WHC), and microbial respiration (qCO2) were measured, and the data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD tests. Total nickel remained stable (about 15.1–15.4 mg/kg; non-significant), whereas the available fraction changed systematically. In Soil 1 (12 months, 1.5%), PE raised DTPA-Ni by +24.9%, PET by +19.8% and PS by −1.7%, while at 3.0% the increases reached +39.8% and +31.7%. In parallel, PE lowered bulk density by up to −16.1%, PET raised water holding capacity by up to +28.9%, and PS raised microbial respiration by up to +38.3%, producing distinct, polymer-specific responses. The changes intensified with time and dose and were milder in the more strongly buffered Soil 2. Microplastics redistribute the biologically active, rather than the total, pool of nickel, a finding that supports reappraising Ni as a nutritional micronutrient and monitoring its available fraction. Because no plants were grown, the nutritional interpretation is advanced as a hypothesis for future testing rather than as a demonstrated agronomic benefit, and the applied microplastic doses (1.5–3.0% w/w) exceed most reported field levels and were chosen to resolve mechanisms under accelerated conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13090469
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Everyday Microplastics Quietly Rewire Nickel Availability in Mediterranean Calcareous Soils

Evangelia E. Golia, Traianos Minos, Alkiviadis Stamatakis
Environments
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

How Everyday Microplastics Quietly Rewire Nickel Availability in Mediterranean Calcareous Soils

Evangelia E. Golia, Traianos Minos, Alkiviadis Stamatakis
article en

Abstract

Microplastics are emerging as ubiquitous contaminants in agricultural soils, while nickel (Ni), although catalogued as a potentially toxic element, is an essential micronutrient and a cofactor of urease. In a pot experiment, this study examined how three microplastics (polyethylene, PE; poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET; and polystyrene, PS) affect nickel availability and the properties of two calcareous agricultural soils from central Greece. The microplastics were applied at two levels (1.5 and 3.0% by weight), and the samples were analysed at four time points (3, 6, 9, and 12 months, n = 3). Total (aqua regia) and available (DTPA) nickel, pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, bulk density (BD), water-holding capacity (WHC), and microbial respiration (qCO2) were measured, and the data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD tests. Total nickel remained stable (about 15.1–15.4 mg/kg; non-significant), whereas the available fraction changed systematically. In Soil 1 (12 months, 1.5%), PE raised DTPA-Ni by +24.9%, PET by +19.8% and PS by −1.7%, while at 3.0% the increases reached +39.8% and +31.7%. In parallel, PE lowered bulk density by up to −16.1%, PET raised water holding capacity by up to +28.9%, and PS raised microbial respiration by up to +38.3%, producing distinct, polymer-specific responses. The changes intensified with time and dose and were milder in the more strongly buffered Soil 2. Microplastics redistribute the biologically active, rather than the total, pool of nickel, a finding that supports reappraising Ni as a nutritional micronutrient and monitoring its available fraction. Because no plants were grown, the nutritional interpretation is advanced as a hypothesis for future testing rather than as a demonstrated agronomic benefit, and the applied microplastic doses (1.5–3.0% w/w) exceed most reported field levels and were chosen to resolve mechanisms under accelerated conditions.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(9)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Everyday Microplastics Quietly Rewire Nickel Availability in Mediterranean Calcareous Soils — Evangelia E. Golia, Traianos Minos, et al. · Environments (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS