The Unconventional Centre Country: Evaluating Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific Engagement

Türkiye has emerged as an unconventional Indo-Pacific actor. This article explains why and how Türkiye has become visible in a region far from its primary strategic theatres, and why this matters for debates on international hierarchy and middle-power agency. Drawing on a neoclassical realist framework and qualitative evidence across five dimensions (trade, political-normative activity, security engagement, external pressures, and regional posture), the article shows that Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific actorness stems from permissive systemic conditions filtered through enduring domestic intervening variables, especially its national role conception as an Afro-Eurasian ‘centre country’. Türkiye’s engagement remains selective and bounded, yet sufficiently consequential to warrant analytical attention. More broadly, the case demonstrates how unconventional actors lacking geographic embeddedness and material centrality can nonetheless shape Indo-Pacific dynamics through calibrated engagement and specialised capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178261478491
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unconventional Centre Country: Evaluating Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific Engagement

Brendon J. Cannon
International Relations
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

The Unconventional Centre Country: Evaluating Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific Engagement

Brendon J. Cannon
article en

Abstract

Türkiye has emerged as an unconventional Indo-Pacific actor. This article explains why and how Türkiye has become visible in a region far from its primary strategic theatres, and why this matters for debates on international hierarchy and middle-power agency. Drawing on a neoclassical realist framework and qualitative evidence across five dimensions (trade, political-normative activity, security engagement, external pressures, and regional posture), the article shows that Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific actorness stems from permissive systemic conditions filtered through enduring domestic intervening variables, especially its national role conception as an Afro-Eurasian ‘centre country’. Türkiye’s engagement remains selective and bounded, yet sufficiently consequential to warrant analytical attention. More broadly, the case demonstrates how unconventional actors lacking geographic embeddedness and material centrality can nonetheless shape Indo-Pacific dynamics through calibrated engagement and specialised capabilities.

International Relations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Balsillie School of International Affairs (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Unconventional Centre Country: Evaluating Türkiye’s Indo-Pacific Engagement — Brendon J. Cannon · International Relations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS