Financial Market Participants and the Scaling Down of Sustainability Reporting in the EU

The European Commission’s so-called Omnibus I Initiative introduces significant revisions to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and related frameworks, seeking to enhance EU competitiveness by narrowing the scope of mandatory sustainability reporting, postponing compliance deadlines, and simplifying reporting standards. While these measures are intended to alleviate costs for businesses – particularly SMEs – they raise concerns about information gaps that could undermine the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the broader EU sustainable finance architecture, and that could increase financial market participants’ reliance on third-party ESG data and ratings. This article examines the implications of excluding SMEs, particularly listed ones, from mandatory reporting, the Commission’s reliance on voluntary disclosure, and the persistence of the pivotal double materiality principle, which complicates alignment with international standards such as IFRS S1/S2. Although simplification is undoubtedly needed – especially in the mandatorily applicable reporting standards – and may support competitiveness, it calls for a more balanced approach and stronger coordination across regulatory frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Law Review
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2026036
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Financial Market Participants and the Scaling Down of Sustainability Reporting in the EU

Gaia Balp
European Business Law Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Financial Market Participants and the Scaling Down of Sustainability Reporting in the EU

Gaia Balp
article en

Abstract

The European Commission’s so-called Omnibus I Initiative introduces significant revisions to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and related frameworks, seeking to enhance EU competitiveness by narrowing the scope of mandatory sustainability reporting, postponing compliance deadlines, and simplifying reporting standards. While these measures are intended to alleviate costs for businesses – particularly SMEs – they raise concerns about information gaps that could undermine the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the broader EU sustainable finance architecture, and that could increase financial market participants’ reliance on third-party ESG data and ratings. This article examines the implications of excluding SMEs, particularly listed ones, from mandatory reporting, the Commission’s reliance on voluntary disclosure, and the persistence of the pivotal double materiality principle, which complicates alignment with international standards such as IFRS S1/S2. Although simplification is undoubtedly needed – especially in the mandatorily applicable reporting standards – and may support competitiveness, it calls for a more balanced approach and stronger coordination across regulatory frameworks.

European Business Law ReviewVol. 37(Issue 6)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.