Knowledge Accuracy and Response Characteristics of an On-Device Large Language Model in Building Environmental Engineering: a Preliminary Case Study of EXAONE 4.0 1.2B Using ChatGPT-4o as a Cloud Reference

This preliminary case study examines EXAONE 4.0 1.2B, an on-device large language model (LLM), in building environmental engineering, using ChatGPT-4o as a high-capability cloud reference rather than a size-matched competitor. Ten Korean-language items were evaluated: four multiple-choice, three single-step calculations, and three short-answer questions covering indoor environmental quality, energy, and post-occupancy evaluation. The same simple prompt condition was applied to both models, with no model-specific prompt optimization; therefore, the results represent one standardized condition rather than each model’s maximum performance. Both models answered all seven objective items correctly, although EXAONE showed terminology confusion in its reasoning on a thermal-environment item. Five doctoral-level experts rated the short-answer responses for accuracy, completeness, and logical consistency. Mean scores were 4.18 for ChatGPT-4o and 2.98 for EXAONE. Fleiss’ kappa was 0.020 and 0.044, while free-marginal kappa was 0.333 and 0.222, respectively; the latter values indicate fair, not moderate, agreement, so absolute expert scores require cautious interpretation. Qualitatively, ChatGPT-4o more consistently organized responses around concepts and scope, whereas EXAONE tended to provide specific technical, operational, and Korean-regulatory content but occasionally omitted canonical elements or added unsupported detail. Because the item pool is small and only one on-device model was tested, the findings are exploratory and cannot be generalized to building environmental engineering as a whole or to on-device LLMs as a class. The results support further investigation of on-device LLMs as supervised offline assistants where connectivity or external data transmission is constrained, but not as unsupervised tools for engineering calculation or compliance decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architectural research
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44515-026-00018-w
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Accuracy and Response Characteristics of an On-Device Large Language Model in Building Environmental Engineering: a Preliminary Case Study of EXAONE 4.0 1.2B Using ChatGPT-4o as a Cloud Reference

Jeong Hoon Lee, Chang-Heon Cheong
Architectural research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Knowledge Accuracy and Response Characteristics of an On-Device Large Language Model in Building Environmental Engineering: a Preliminary Case Study of EXAONE 4.0 1.2B Using ChatGPT-4o as a Cloud Reference

Jeong Hoon Lee, Chang-Heon Cheong
article en

Abstract

This preliminary case study examines EXAONE 4.0 1.2B, an on-device large language model (LLM), in building environmental engineering, using ChatGPT-4o as a high-capability cloud reference rather than a size-matched competitor. Ten Korean-language items were evaluated: four multiple-choice, three single-step calculations, and three short-answer questions covering indoor environmental quality, energy, and post-occupancy evaluation. The same simple prompt condition was applied to both models, with no model-specific prompt optimization; therefore, the results represent one standardized condition rather than each model’s maximum performance. Both models answered all seven objective items correctly, although EXAONE showed terminology confusion in its reasoning on a thermal-environment item. Five doctoral-level experts rated the short-answer responses for accuracy, completeness, and logical consistency. Mean scores were 4.18 for ChatGPT-4o and 2.98 for EXAONE. Fleiss’ kappa was 0.020 and 0.044, while free-marginal kappa was 0.333 and 0.222, respectively; the latter values indicate fair, not moderate, agreement, so absolute expert scores require cautious interpretation. Qualitatively, ChatGPT-4o more consistently organized responses around concepts and scope, whereas EXAONE tended to provide specific technical, operational, and Korean-regulatory content but occasionally omitted canonical elements or added unsupported detail. Because the item pool is small and only one on-device model was tested, the findings are exploratory and cannot be generalized to building environmental engineering as a whole or to on-device LLMs as a class. The results support further investigation of on-device LLMs as supervised offline assistants where connectivity or external data transmission is constrained, but not as unsupervised tools for engineering calculation or compliance decisions.

Architectural researchVol. 28(1)
Gyeongsang National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knowledge Accuracy and Response Characteristics of an On-Device Large Language Model in Building Environmental Engineering: a Preliminary Case Study of EXAONE 4.0 1.2B Using ChatGPT-4o as a Cloud Reference — Jeong Hoon Lee, Chang-Heon Cheong · Architectural research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS