Development and test-retest reliability of a laboratory-based shipboard firefighting simulation for controlled performance testing

Understanding shipboard firefighting performance is critical for improving crew safety and vessel preservation during damage control events. While prior research has been conducted in naval spaces, controlled simulations that assess performance without requiring naval vessels, personnel or specialised equipment are lacking. This study was designed to both develop and test a laboratory-based shipboard firefighting simulation. Consistent with shipboard firefighting activities, the simulation included walking, stair climbing, hose dragging, simulated boundary cooling, extinguisher carrying and casualty dragging tasks, completed within 8 min. Twenty-seven participants (22 males, 5 females) performed the simulation twice, with good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.78; SEM = 17.6 s). Compared to Session 1, time-to-completion was 2.6% faster, RPE was 12.2% higher, HR was 5% lower, and core temperature estimate was 0.8% lower in Session 2 (all p < 0.05). This simulation provides a practical, low-cost solution for conducting shipboard firefighting research using minimal space, equipment, and untrained subjects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104875
Primary Topic
Marine and Coastal Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and test-retest reliability of a laboratory-based shipboard firefighting simulation for controlled performance testing

Benjamin J. C. Kirk, Tim L. A. Doyle, Jodie A. Wills, Rohan Edmonds et al.
Applied Ergonomics
Marine and Coastal Research
article

Development and test-retest reliability of a laboratory-based shipboard firefighting simulation for controlled performance testing

Benjamin J. C. Kirk, Tim L. A. Doyle, Jodie A. Wills, Rohan Edmonds, Rhiannon Campbell, Bronia Glen, Mark Wiggins
article en

Abstract

Understanding shipboard firefighting performance is critical for improving crew safety and vessel preservation during damage control events. While prior research has been conducted in naval spaces, controlled simulations that assess performance without requiring naval vessels, personnel or specialised equipment are lacking. This study was designed to both develop and test a laboratory-based shipboard firefighting simulation. Consistent with shipboard firefighting activities, the simulation included walking, stair climbing, hose dragging, simulated boundary cooling, extinguisher carrying and casualty dragging tasks, completed within 8 min. Twenty-seven participants (22 males, 5 females) performed the simulation twice, with good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.78; SEM = 17.6 s). Compared to Session 1, time-to-completion was 2.6% faster, RPE was 12.2% higher, HR was 5% lower, and core temperature estimate was 0.8% lower in Session 2 (all p < 0.05). This simulation provides a practical, low-cost solution for conducting shipboard firefighting research using minimal space, equipment, and untrained subjects.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 139
Macquarie University (AU)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Marine and Coastal Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.