Bibliometric analysis of groundwater remediation research in China and the United States: a comparative insight

The United States and China were the two most productive countries in global groundwater pollution remediation research, having accumulated substantial findings and practical experience through sustained funding and long-term scientific investment. However, a comprehensive comparative analysis of their research landscapes remained lacking. This study employed bibliometric methods to systematically examine multiple dimensions of groundwater remediation research in both countries over the period 2016–2025, including publication output, journal distribution, core scholars, leading institutions, and funding structures. It visualized research themes and hotspots in both countries through visualization techniques and statistical analysis. The results revealed that both nations ranked as the top two contributors globally in total publication volume during this period, with the U.S. maintaining a higher citation impact per paper. In China, the top 10 universities and research institutes accounted for approximately half of the national output, focusing on remediation materials and microscopic mechanisms under a centralized funding regime dominated by national-level foundations. Conversely, the U.S. fostered a collaborative research ecosystem integrating federal agencies, national laboratories, and universities, characterized by a focus on emerging contaminants and radioactive contaminant remediation, supported by autonomous funding from multiple federal departments. Furthermore, this study examined the heterogeneity in groundwater contamination profiles and regulatory demands between the two nations, alongside differences in funding models, and discussed implications for future development strategies, while acknowledging the inherent limitations of the bibliometric approach. This work provided valuable insights for researchers and policymakers to identify research landscape and optimize strategic layouts in groundwater pollution remediation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Earth Sciences
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13080-3
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bibliometric analysis of groundwater remediation research in China and the United States: a comparative insight

Sheng Xu, Kejia Ning, Haihua Wang, Shuqing Yao et al.
Environmental Earth Sciences
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

Bibliometric analysis of groundwater remediation research in China and the United States: a comparative insight

Sheng Xu, Kejia Ning, Haihua Wang, Shuqing Yao, Xinqi Hu, Wengeng Cao, Wei Zhang
article en

Abstract

The United States and China were the two most productive countries in global groundwater pollution remediation research, having accumulated substantial findings and practical experience through sustained funding and long-term scientific investment. However, a comprehensive comparative analysis of their research landscapes remained lacking. This study employed bibliometric methods to systematically examine multiple dimensions of groundwater remediation research in both countries over the period 2016–2025, including publication output, journal distribution, core scholars, leading institutions, and funding structures. It visualized research themes and hotspots in both countries through visualization techniques and statistical analysis. The results revealed that both nations ranked as the top two contributors globally in total publication volume during this period, with the U.S. maintaining a higher citation impact per paper. In China, the top 10 universities and research institutes accounted for approximately half of the national output, focusing on remediation materials and microscopic mechanisms under a centralized funding regime dominated by national-level foundations. Conversely, the U.S. fostered a collaborative research ecosystem integrating federal agencies, national laboratories, and universities, characterized by a focus on emerging contaminants and radioactive contaminant remediation, supported by autonomous funding from multiple federal departments. Furthermore, this study examined the heterogeneity in groundwater contamination profiles and regulatory demands between the two nations, alongside differences in funding models, and discussed implications for future development strategies, while acknowledging the inherent limitations of the bibliometric approach. This work provided valuable insights for researchers and policymakers to identify research landscape and optimize strategic layouts in groundwater pollution remediation.

Environmental Earth SciencesVol. 85(15)
China Geological Survey (CN), National Library of China (CN), Institute of Hydroecology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.