Quantifying Carbon Storage in Black Ash Wetlands Following Emerald Ash Borer and Forest Management

Abstract The impacts of non-native Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) are likely to be most severe in black ash wetlands, possibly requiring preemptive forest management to maintain ecosystem functions such as carbon storage. We used a silvicultural experiment in northern Minnesota to evaluate how EAB-induced mortality and preemptive management affect total ecosystem carbon storage and the distribution of carbon among ecosystem pools. Treatments included tree girdling to emulate EAB-induced tree mortality, clearcutting, 20% canopy removal with group selection and an undisturbed control. Ash trees ( Fraxinus spp.) in the control black ash wetlands stored 116.7 (± 5.3) Mg C ha −1 , and live tree carbon storage increased by 1.8 (± 0.12) Mg C ha −1 yr −1 over the study period. Twelve years after treatment, total ecosystem carbon was lower in all treatments relative to the control and lowest in clearcuts. In the emulated-EAB treatment, representing a do-nothing scenario, total ecosystem carbon decreased by 22% relative to the control, with 71.6 (± 4.7) Mg C ha −1 remaining in deadwood pools where continued decomposition will lead to further carbon storage loss. Understory carbon increased in clearcuts following treatment, but only a small fraction was associated with potential canopy-replacement species. Soil carbon storage was highly variable, with no significant differences among treatments. Our results demonstrate that both EAB-induced mortality and preemptive management substantially alter carbon storage in black ash wetlands. Further management aimed at maintaining forest canopy, particularly through the establishment of non-host tree species, may be necessary to prevent a permanent reduction in regional carbon storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystems
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-026-01120-9
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Carbon Storage in Black Ash Wetlands Following Emerald Ash Borer and Forest Management

Douglas N. Kastendick, Rebecca Montgomery, Brian J. Palik, Robert A. Slesak et al.
Ecosystems
Forest ecology and management
article

Quantifying Carbon Storage in Black Ash Wetlands Following Emerald Ash Borer and Forest Management

Douglas N. Kastendick, Rebecca Montgomery, Brian J. Palik, Robert A. Slesak, Alexis R. Grinde, Anthony W. D’Amato, Erin KP Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract The impacts of non-native Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) are likely to be most severe in black ash wetlands, possibly requiring preemptive forest management to maintain ecosystem functions such as carbon storage. We used a silvicultural experiment in northern Minnesota to evaluate how EAB-induced mortality and preemptive management affect total ecosystem carbon storage and the distribution of carbon among ecosystem pools. Treatments included tree girdling to emulate EAB-induced tree mortality, clearcutting, 20% canopy removal with group selection and an undisturbed control. Ash trees ( Fraxinus spp.) in the control black ash wetlands stored 116.7 (± 5.3) Mg C ha −1 , and live tree carbon storage increased by 1.8 (± 0.12) Mg C ha −1 yr −1 over the study period. Twelve years after treatment, total ecosystem carbon was lower in all treatments relative to the control and lowest in clearcuts. In the emulated-EAB treatment, representing a do-nothing scenario, total ecosystem carbon decreased by 22% relative to the control, with 71.6 (± 4.7) Mg C ha −1 remaining in deadwood pools where continued decomposition will lead to further carbon storage loss. Understory carbon increased in clearcuts following treatment, but only a small fraction was associated with potential canopy-replacement species. Soil carbon storage was highly variable, with no significant differences among treatments. Our results demonstrate that both EAB-induced mortality and preemptive management substantially alter carbon storage in black ash wetlands. Further management aimed at maintaining forest canopy, particularly through the establishment of non-host tree species, may be necessary to prevent a permanent reduction in regional carbon storage.

EcosystemsVol. 29(6)
University of Vermont (US), University of Minnesota (US), US Forest Service (US), Northern Research Station (US), University of Minnesota, Duluth (US), Pacific Northwest Research Station (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund, Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station
Climate action, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon